• Welcome to Ecoboost Performance Forum. Please log in or sign up.
collapse

Hesitation in boost and high rpm

Started by polskifacet, December 04, 2016, 12:27:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

polskifacet

#345
Yes I wish to increase the performance of my fuel system. My car has been looked over by two ASE certified mechanics. Both have multiple 1000 hp vehicles including Fords. My car doesn't show any signs of not being mechanically perfect. LMS actually does deal with problems like mine I was there. My problem is I am having difficulty coordinating next steps and possibly a revisit.

Again I'm willing to pay, I would buy the pump today if it satisfies my expectations.
AEM Dryflo drop in. PP Transmission Cooler and thermostat. 160 tstat, 3 bar map, plugs, AJP 93 Tune, PP Shocks and Springs

AJP turbo

#346
So just to be clear. It is your contention that nothing is wrong with the car?

Just throwing this out there but i wouldnt boast about passing the ase certification exam....its pretty basic and a slightly above average shadetree mechanic can pass....unfortunately its about the only standard out there
SCT Dealer/Custom Calibrator                        
Specializing in 3.5 Ecoboost   
Remote/email custom tuning including E85 blends 
Authorized retailer for all SCT devices. 
 
Former:2014 PP SHO
3 bar 93 tune, Airaid, Stainless Works non catted DP's  
405whp/520tq
Dyno
     
Current:2016 F150 2.7 Ecoboost
Tuning in progress

polskifacet

We can argue over email as this is degrading the quality of  this thread and misguiding it's direction.

There is nothing wrong with my vehicle as all values are in spec on the stock tune. If my fuel system isn't performing well with a tune I will rely on LMS a performance shop to increase the performance of my fuel system. As I said my problem is coordinating with LMS on how to move forward.
AEM Dryflo drop in. PP Transmission Cooler and thermostat. 160 tstat, 3 bar map, plugs, AJP 93 Tune, PP Shocks and Springs

polskifacet

#348
What will having a higher performance fuel pump accomplish:

Having a larger fuel pump could "mask" the issue etc but if its allowing the car to keep full fuel pressure then case closed?

Larger HPFP can't suck more fuel out of the tank per se, if its a feed issue, I should have the same issue with a big pump?

Is LMS able to generate more power on stock turbos with the bigger pump? If so I would experience the same issue when getting closer to the limit of the pump if it was a ecu/signal issue?
AEM Dryflo drop in. PP Transmission Cooler and thermostat. 160 tstat, 3 bar map, plugs, AJP 93 Tune, PP Shocks and Springs

lamrith

#349
Quote from: polskifacet on May 08, 2017, 10:55:16 AM
What will having a higher performance fuel pump accomplish:

Having a larger fuel pump could "mask" the issue etc but if its allowing the car to keep full fuel pressure then case closed?

Larger HPFP can't suck more fuel out of the tank per se, if its a feed issue, I should have the same issue with a big pump?

Is LMS able to generate more power on stock turbos with the bigger pump? If so I would experience the same issue when getting closer to the limit of the pump if it was a ecu/signal issue?
So what I have read it sounds like all of your individual physical parts have been tested and pass testing.  If the pumps test fine and they tested that they can sustain flow AND pressure properly, That tells me your problem lays outside of the individual components and is in the system itself.

This may not be what you want to hear, but I think everyone here is genuinely just trying to help you out. 

This is something I have had in my head the last week or two following along in this thread and been waiting to say pending the testing you were doing.

I think it would be interesting to see what the fuel pressure is coming out of the tank right at the tank and right before the HPFP, then also at the HPFP outlet and all the way at the last possible point at the rail.  No idea how you would hook sensors up and monitor them during run/passes.  Any notable drop between the pairs will tell you that you have a clog someplace between the gauges and could very easily explain your car not recovering FP easily when tuned.  Your car may be just fine under low demand like when it is stock (this is a long thread, have you run a log with bone stock tune?), but once you exceed a certain demand (custom tune) then the car is asking for more fuel than can be supplied past the restriction.  I work in hydraulics and this is troubleshooting 101 dealing with pressure/flow issues in a system.  You look for the pressure drop, we see it all the time in mobile machines were something has caused a restriction in a line.  Could be a kink, piece of debris, bad connector, you name it.  A kink for example may restrict the flow of your fuel line 25%.  Not an issue in stock trim as the car at WOT may only need 70% of max line flow.  But with tune, you may need 90% of max fuel line flow to stay at pressure, but your line is only able to flow a max of 75% so you are short 15%.  Static pressure test, all will look just fine, you have to check under max flow demand as well.

Having a larger (stronger) pump may mask your issue and get you off and running.  But you would then again have issues trying to use the pump to its actual HP capacity at a later time.  While I can appreciate that it is a "fix", it is just not the right way to fix an issue like you are having.  It is like if someone had installed ballast in your car before you got it.  You get it and try 1/4mile and it is running high 14 second, when everything on paper says it should be mid 13's.  You could just throw more HP at it with a tune and get yourself back to where it should have been stock, or look around and realize that it has extra weight and get it removed.  Then when you do the tune you are right with everyone else rather than having spent extra $ to be where everyone else started from...  You will also be working that stronger pump harder all the time, as it will be pushing higher pressure to overcome that flow restriction.

If your current HPFP is being starved then it would not be able to keep pressure.  There could be a restriction between the low pressure intank pump and the high pressure.  That is what I am thinking at least, and gauges as mentioned would show that.  If the pump in the tank is putting out say 80psi at idle, but the inlet of the high pressure only sees 60, then you have an issue.  If that differential gets bigger as you rev the engine, again, it points to an issue, the high pressure is asking for more than the low pressure can feed it whether because the low pres pump is bad or the line restricted..
'13 Sho PP, SCT x4, AJP 92-Octane rev6 (14psi&20spark) NGK 6510, 3Bar, K&N CAI, PPE Catted DP, Dynomax Axleback, 20*9.5 Voxx Lago w/ 275/40-20 GMAX AS-05.

polskifacet

#350
Up to this point, no one has been able to provide what volume I should be getting. There is no schrader valve so some assortment of fuel connectors is required to hook up a gauge inline. LMS supposedly hooked up a fuel pressure gauge inline and ran it on the dyno. If they didn't see pressure drop 8 inches before the HPFP while doing the pull, how could there not be proper volume?

LMS would have to chime in because I haven't received any paperwork on what exactly they did. The were also supposed to check a plug or two for condition, if its soaked in fuel etc.
AEM Dryflo drop in. PP Transmission Cooler and thermostat. 160 tstat, 3 bar map, plugs, AJP 93 Tune, PP Shocks and Springs

lamrith

#351
Quote from: polskifacet on May 08, 2017, 04:20:18 PM
Up to this point, no one has been able to provide what volume I should be getting. There is no schrader valve so some assortment of fuel connectors is required to hook up a gauge inline. LMS supposedly hooked up a fuel pressure gauge inline and ran it on the dyno. If they didn't see pressure drop 8 inches before the HPFP while doing the pull, how could there not be proper volume?
Yeah getting Volume data will probably be tough, but the pressure is a factor of that.  Yes getting gauges/sensors installed would for sure not be a simple thing by any means.  I have never heard of someone hooking up gauges like I am talking about on a modern fuel system, totally out of the norm for a fuel system to need something like that.  Not something I would even consider normally, but your problem seems to defy all attempts to correct it, so drastic measures time....  LMS probably hooked it up at the rail as a way to verify what the sensor was reading properly?  Pure guesswork on my part, and they can correct me if I am wrong and they choose to, but that is normally what a shop would do to troubleshoot an issue.  This is purely from my background in hydraulic systems and hydraulic fluid flow.

There will of course be some pressure drop when demand increases at the pump, but the drop should be across the line meaning the drop is also seen at the in-tank pump by the same amount.  At Idle the in-tank pump could be pushing 80psi out and the high pressure sees 80psi, but under WOT the in-tank may be showing 80psi and then the high pressure only seeing 60 of it if that makes sense, that would indicate there is a restriction between the in tank pump and the high pressure one on your valve cover.  Not an issue at idle, but is an issue when demand is higher.

FYI - any numbers I am posting are purely fictitious to illustrate a point and in no way what you should actually look for as a target for a healthy system...
'13 Sho PP, SCT x4, AJP 92-Octane rev6 (14psi&20spark) NGK 6510, 3Bar, K&N CAI, PPE Catted DP, Dynomax Axleback, 20*9.5 Voxx Lago w/ 275/40-20 GMAX AS-05.

StealBlueSho

#352
There is a schrader valve for the Low Pressure Fuel System at the top passenger rear of the engine bay... I have used it to diagnose fuel pressure concerns before.

I have no clue to how pressure test the direct injection pump...I remember seeing the sensor for it located on one of the rails... right side I believe.. it was an exploded out parts view... you would need to remove the intake manifold to get to it...

lamrith

Quote from: StealBlueSho on May 08, 2017, 04:46:20 PM
There is a schrader valve for the Low Pressure Fuel System at the top passenger rear of the engine bay... I have used it to diagnose fuel pressure concerns before.

I have no clue to how pressure test the direct injection pump...
Yeah, based on what I am seeing logs one would need a 3 or 4k PSI fuel rated gauge to put on the fuel rail or splice inline with fittings of some sort.  Def not a simple thing to do, or for the feint of hearth/shadetree mechanic.
'13 Sho PP, SCT x4, AJP 92-Octane rev6 (14psi&20spark) NGK 6510, 3Bar, K&N CAI, PPE Catted DP, Dynomax Axleback, 20*9.5 Voxx Lago w/ 275/40-20 GMAX AS-05.

polskifacet

Looking at a fuel pressure gauge while doing a WOT pull as they supposedly did would show exactly what you are talking about. I am also fairly certain that the pipe off the HPFP to rail is new as it is technically not reusable(with new long block). Again I unfortunately don't have all the facts from my visit to LMS and can't seem to get them at least from the people I talk to.

@StealBlueSho I will check again but my car does't appear to have the test port from what i remember when I went over the line to look for any kinks/damage.

@lamrith I watched a good Delphi video on DI testing and they didn't recommend testing the high pressure side other then relying on the sensor data.
AEM Dryflo drop in. PP Transmission Cooler and thermostat. 160 tstat, 3 bar map, plugs, AJP 93 Tune, PP Shocks and Springs

StealBlueSho

Quote from: lamrith on May 08, 2017, 04:49:02 PM
Quote from: StealBlueSho on May 08, 2017, 04:46:20 PM
There is a schrader valve for the Low Pressure Fuel System at the top passenger rear of the engine bay... I have used it to diagnose fuel pressure concerns before.

I have no clue to how pressure test the direct injection pump...
Yeah, based on what I am seeing logs one would need a 3 or 4k PSI fuel rated gauge to put on the fuel rail or splice inline with fittings of some sort.  Def not a simple thing to do, or for the feint of hearth/shadetree mechanic.

You would be correct. You can easily see the the fuel lines from the schrader valve to the HPFP. So from a basic "is there a kink" perspective that would be easy peasy....

The HPFP does contain a microfilter.... so if there was junk in the lines for some reason that could be an issue... I know he had the issue before and after the motor replacement so not sure if it applies.....

StealBlueSho


polskifacet

Quote from: StealBlueSho on May 08, 2017, 04:54:29 PM


Freshly taken...

Yea man my car doesn't have that for sure. Maybe it's something they changed in 2013 +.
AEM Dryflo drop in. PP Transmission Cooler and thermostat. 160 tstat, 3 bar map, plugs, AJP 93 Tune, PP Shocks and Springs

StealBlueSho

Quote from: polskifacet on May 08, 2017, 04:57:13 PM
Quote from: StealBlueSho on May 08, 2017, 04:54:29 PM


Freshly taken...

Yea man my car doesn't have that for sure. Maybe it's something they changed in 2013 +.

Wow... then I dunno?

lamrith

Quote from: polskifacet on May 08, 2017, 04:52:18 PM
Looking at a fuel pressure gauge while doing a WOT pull as they supposedly did would show exactly what you are talking about. I am also fairly certain that the pipe off the HPFP to rail is new as it is technically not reusable(with new long block). Again I unfortunately don't have all the facts from my visit to LMS and can't seem to get them at least from the people I talk to.

@StealBlueSho I will check again but my car does't appear to have the test port from what i remember when I went over the line to look for any kinks/damage.

@lamrith I watched a good Delphi video on DI testing and they didn't recommend testing the high pressure side other then relying on the sensor data.
Yes what I am describing is def far outside the norm.  Call it a last resort before throwing a match on it, or trading it in..  Normally when a car cannot maintain FP it will be  pump or fuel filter, or even stuck open injector 99.99999% of the time.  But as you have mentioned, all of those items have been addressed/replaced, so I am literally throwing educated guess/ideas out to try.

Based on what Steal just said, the dual gauges on high pressure side would not make sense now either given the short and visible length of that system.  It is dropping pressure which should mean one of two things; either it is not good, or the intank pump is not supplying it enough fuel and it is starving.  SO I would see what can be done to log/verify pressure before the high pressure pump.
'13 Sho PP, SCT x4, AJP 92-Octane rev6 (14psi&20spark) NGK 6510, 3Bar, K&N CAI, PPE Catted DP, Dynomax Axleback, 20*9.5 Voxx Lago w/ 275/40-20 GMAX AS-05.