Started by StealBlueSho, January 20, 2018, 09:32:19 AM
Quote from: 68_GT on January 24, 2018, 07:30:09 PMif PTU and trans upgrades were available I would have got the ATP turbos and built engine when my stock engine blew up. So I put in a new Ford longblock and EB Performance billet wheels in my stock turbos. I'll put the other money into my 68 Mustang.
Quote from: stealbluesho on January 24, 2018, 08:07:02 PMSo I called LME on Monday... after having a pleasant conversation with Clay it's been crickets. As SHOdded eluded too I don't believe the market is big enough for a group like LME is invest the time even if someone was paying... maybe 1 or 2 sales after that? Probably not enough to recoup the engineering hours...In any event... NOVA Speed Shop got back to me... they have a couple options they want to discuss... one involves a LS Swap and the other involves swapping out the tranny/PTU/RDU but keeping the 3.5TT power plant... Gonna stop by Thursday or Friday of this week time permitting to see what their plans are and how much it's going to cost....
Quote from: SilvererSHO on January 24, 2018, 11:59:08 PMI think tearing out the PTU, driveshaft, rear differential and powering the rear wheels with electric motors would be a way to get an SHO into the 10's. The car would tip the scales a couple of hundrend lbs. heavier though. It may sound silly, but it's amazing what some are doing with electric power now. Or, the F-150 set-up/RWD conversion sounds cool too. Screw the idea of putting a LS of any incarnation into a SHO.
Quote from: AJP turbo on January 23, 2018, 12:39:03 AMQuote from: SHOdded on January 23, 2018, 12:28:26 AMI love the LS engines, and GM loves them too. I love engines that have high specific output and the LS's do not and I hate anything that has the word general or generic in it...It's just my code
Quote from: SHOdded on January 23, 2018, 12:28:26 AMI love the LS engines, and GM loves them too.
Quote from: ShoBoat on January 26, 2018, 01:19:43 PMQuote from: AJP turbo on January 23, 2018, 12:39:03 AMQuote from: SHOdded on January 23, 2018, 12:28:26 AMI love the LS engines, and GM loves them too. I love engines that have high specific output and the LS's do not and I hate anything that has the word general or generic in it...It's just my codeI don't regret for a second buying my Generic Motors low output LSA powered CTSV. :pSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: AJP turbo on January 26, 2018, 01:31:59 PMQuote from: ShoBoat on January 26, 2018, 01:19:43 PMQuote from: AJP turbo on January 23, 2018, 12:39:03 AMQuote from: SHOdded on January 23, 2018, 12:28:26 AMI love the LS engines, and GM loves them too. I love engines that have high specific output and the LS's do not and I hate anything that has the word general or generic in it...It's just my codeI don't regret for a second buying my Generic Motors low output LSA powered CTSV. :pSent from my iPhone using TapatalkEh ho hum ...you had to mention the low volume specialty engine from generic motors which a far cry from your run of the mill LS variant....even in LSA form which has forced induction it doesn't even make 100hp/literIf it doesn't make 100hp/liter you can keep it especially when boosted its just a failed engineering project But I'd drive it lol