• Welcome to Ecoboost Performance Forum. Please log in or sign up.
collapse

Livernois custom tune with upgraded turbos dyno results

Started by ONLYA6, May 12, 2014, 08:27:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ONLYA6

Quote from: JimJak on May 13, 2014, 07:29:50 PM
Also, onlya6's original post doesn't sound to me like he asked to stay at just 400... Where did you get that from?

I did agree on 400ish. Originally when I got the wrong sheet that showed 387 I said I would have been happier if it was 400-415 area and 430-440 tq.

As we see in the other dyno sheet I ended up with 395/443 which is damn near exactly where I figured I would be upon receiving the car back. Obviously if you have something in your mind that you are expecting anything less would be a slight dissapointment.

Possibly in the future I will get it tuned for more power to take full advantage of the turbos. I just bought a house so I'm not looking to replace a motor right now. Would it handle more power just fine? I don't know. There are two opinions on that right now. Of course I would have been thrilled to have 440/475 like it made on one pull during testing. I will settle with this for now until we see more long term experience with durability.

Like I said -- more power with less boost is always a good thing.
Steven

2013 Taurus SHO - Best ET 12.7/ MPH 110
1999 Mustang V6 - Turbo - 474 whp 431 wtq

ONLYA6

Quote from: southtxSHO on May 13, 2014, 08:17:13 PM
IMO if owner and LMS agreed to tune car around the range that is stated then why was this thread even made by OP. Just saying .

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

This sub-forum is called dyno results? No?
Steven

2013 Taurus SHO - Best ET 12.7/ MPH 110
1999 Mustang V6 - Turbo - 474 whp 431 wtq

southtxSHO

Quote from: ONLYA6 on May 14, 2014, 07:58:58 AM
Quote from: southtxSHO on May 13, 2014, 08:17:13 PM
IMO if owner and LMS agreed to tune car around the range that is stated then why was this thread even made by OP. Just saying .

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

This sub-forum is called dyno results? No?
Well you were complaining about the dyno results . No ?

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

2011 SHO non PP
LMS 4 +tune
LMS Cai
LMS catted downpipes
12.89@ 105 MPH best time @ Edinburg Raceway

ONLYA6

Quote from: 4DRHTRD on May 13, 2014, 09:03:28 PM
I've talked to Steven he was disappointed with his numbers, I'll help him any way I can to achieve his goals

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

I'm dissapointed if the car can handle more power safely. If not then I'm alright as is. Especially since I see now I had the TQ I was expecting. 404 vs 443 is a nice jump. Thinking here over the last few days what next for the car, with the new house purchase, I decided I won't chance it right now.

Also, seeing what power it made on the 2nd sheet addresses a few points I was questioning -- most notably that the PPE downpipes were the reason for lower TQ numbers. They aren't at all.

In the end it's just a sheet with numbers. The track numbers will tell all.
Steven

2013 Taurus SHO - Best ET 12.7/ MPH 110
1999 Mustang V6 - Turbo - 474 whp 431 wtq

ONLYA6

Quote from: southtxSHO on May 14, 2014, 08:11:26 AM
Quote from: ONLYA6 on May 14, 2014, 07:58:58 AM
Quote from: southtxSHO on May 13, 2014, 08:17:13 PM
IMO if owner and LMS agreed to tune car around the range that is stated then why was this thread even made by OP. Just saying .

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

This sub-forum is called dyno results? No?
Well you were complaining about the dyno results . No ?

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

I was slightly dissapointed at the time of posting but mainly sharing my information from the tuning. That's the point of this forum and that's why I quoted your post asking why I even put this up.

It is resolved now since the correct sheet was posted and I'm basically right where I expected to be.

I do wonder if it could safely handle more power but deciding not chance that now.

Steven

2013 Taurus SHO - Best ET 12.7/ MPH 110
1999 Mustang V6 - Turbo - 474 whp 431 wtq

southtxSHO

Quote from: ONLYA6 on May 14, 2014, 08:22:56 AM
Quote from: southtxSHO on May 14, 2014, 08:11:26 AM
Quote from: ONLYA6 on May 14, 2014, 07:58:58 AM
Quote from: southtxSHO on May 13, 2014, 08:17:13 PM
IMO if owner and LMS agreed to tune car around the range that is stated then why was this thread even made by OP. Just saying .

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

This sub-forum is called dyno results? No?
Well you were complaining about the dyno results . No ?

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

I was slightly dissapointed at the time of posting but mainly sharing my information from the tuning. That's the point of this forum and that's why I quoted your post asking why I even put this up.

It is resolved now since the correct sheet was posted and I'm basically right where I expected to be.

I do wonder if it could safely handle more power but deciding not chance that now.

Gotcha ! My bad then . Any plans on taking it to the track soon ?

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

2011 SHO non PP
LMS 4 +tune
LMS Cai
LMS catted downpipes
12.89@ 105 MPH best time @ Edinburg Raceway

ONLYA6

Steven

2013 Taurus SHO - Best ET 12.7/ MPH 110
1999 Mustang V6 - Turbo - 474 whp 431 wtq

EcoPowerParts

I'm guessing OP was remembering BPD's dyno with almost the same setup on a 2010 car.
ATP turbos, meth injection downpipes, hot pipes and air filter.
http://www.ecoboostperformanceforum.com/index.php/topic,2162.msg30576.html#msg30576
Even 443HP was a really conservative tune according to Mike, boost being at around 18 psi.
If anybody is going to find out if the motor is going to blow it will be Mike. I look forward to him running some 11's this spring on that setup, it's a package easily replicated and sold!
Mike B | info@ecopowerparts.com
www.ecopowerparts.com -
please use my website for any price quotes and to submit any orders.
Please email me via info@ecopowerparts.com if you have any questions on new or existing orders, PM's via the forum are hard to track your purchase as I can't relate user name to actual name.
https://www.facebook.com/ecopowerparts

Livernois Motorsports

The questions about why are people building engines, and what are the limitations of the drivetrains have all been posted before. It is the end of the day and we will try to address more of the questions that you guys have tomorrow.

Wilson

Can't wait to see what kind of numbers you do at the track. Even with the "conservative" tune that thing is a beast!

Sent from my Lumia 1520 using Tapatalk
2013 SHO (non-PP) Ruby Red Tintcoat
Leading Edge Tuning 93 Tune | 3 Bar MAP | 170* Thermostat | Airaid Intake | PPE 2.5" Downpipes | Snow Stage 2 Meth Kit | H&R Lowering Springs | 22" Falken RT-7M wheels | 265/35/22 Falken Ziex TZ05 tires


JimiJak

Quote from: Livernois Motorsports on May 14, 2014, 06:13:00 PM
The questions about why are people building engines, and what are the limitations of the drivetrains have all been posted before. It is the end of the day and we will try to address more of the questions that you guys have tomorrow.

Thank you for your follow up.
I think the biggest questions from all of this are:

- If staying around 400hp was a cooperative decision between you and the customer, under your recommendations for longevity, why sell or recommend the upgraded turbos? Staying around 14psi sustained boost is something the stock turbos could easily handle, correct?

- Are you seeing a pattern of rod failures in 450+hp engines?
- What types of hp are they pushing?
- How many / frequently have you found this?
- Any other trends in the broken con rod engines?
     ie. where did they get the majority of their power?
          uber high boost, meth, turbo upgrades, E-85 mixing etc.


There is a lot of knowledge to be gained from your findings, and we would like to join you in establishing safer means of building powerful, modified daily drivers without breaking the bank.
"America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed." - Eleanor Roosevelt

2014 XSport Black Betty Build

ONLYA6


Quote from: JimiJak on May 14, 2014, 10:59:29 PM
Quote from: Livernois Motorsports on May 14, 2014, 06:13:00 PM
The questions about why are people building engines, and what are the limitations of the drivetrains have all been posted before. It is the end of the day and we will try to address more of the questions that you guys have tomorrow.



- If staying around 400hp was a cooperative decision between you and the customer, under your recommendations for longevity, why sell or recommend the upgraded turbos? Staying around 14psi sustained boost is something the stock turbos could easily handle

Stock turbos aren't going to make 400/443 at 14 psi. It takes around 18-20 I believe to see that with meth.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Steven

2013 Taurus SHO - Best ET 12.7/ MPH 110
1999 Mustang V6 - Turbo - 474 whp 431 wtq

JimiJak

Quote from: ONLYA6 on May 12, 2014, 08:27:12 AM
I hooked up my Scan Gage last night and it looks like im seeing around 14 lbs in 1st and 2nd gear and it is steady at 16 lbs 3rd gear and on.
At this point the turbos seems like a waste but more power with less boost overall than running meth only is always good.

Oh, ok just going by the numbers provided.
"America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed." - Eleanor Roosevelt

2014 XSport Black Betty Build

Livernois Motorsports

#73
Quote from: JimiJak on May 14, 2014, 10:59:29 PM
Quote from: Livernois Motorsports on May 14, 2014, 06:13:00 PM
The questions about why are people building engines, and what are the limitations of the drivetrains have all been posted before. It is the end of the day and we will try to address more of the questions that you guys have tomorrow.

Thank you for your follow up.
I think the biggest questions from all of this are:

- If staying around 400hp was a cooperative decision between you and the customer, under your recommendations for longevity, why sell or recommend the upgraded turbos? Staying around 14psi sustained boost is something the stock turbos could easily handle, correct?

- Are you seeing a pattern of rod failures in 450+hp engines?
- What types of hp are they pushing?
- How many / frequently have you found this?
- Any other trends in the broken con rod engines?
     ie. where did they get the majority of their power?
          uber high boost, meth, turbo upgrades, E-85 mixing etc.


There is a lot of knowledge to be gained from your findings, and we would like to join you in establishing safer means of building powerful, modified daily drivers without breaking the bank.

The engines that we have seen fail have come to us as engines being shipped from around the country, not the whole car so we cannot see what exactly the owners of these engines have going on, many of these failures we have seen the owners have not disclosed their mods, nor power level, but based on our experience, and knowledge of these engines we know the range they would be in.

We have only seen a few failures from engines sent to us by other shops, so not that often. We have not yet had a failure with vehicles that we have done and tuned. The way that these vehicles are tuned also plays a huge part into the failures. The ones that we have seen fail are above the 450 Whp mark.

When we tune customer cars we go over all of the risks involved in tuning, and we make our customers aware of these. We then take our knowledge that we have acquired through testing on our own shop cars, and knowledge from OEM durability testing and apply that knowledge to our suggestions. Our goal in this industry is to be the best and offer our customers superior offerings and reliability for their vehicles. To us, reliability means years, and decades of enjoyment, not just a season or two.

We offer and sell components that exceed the power limitation because without them, there would be no expanding of the market. We want people to not reach a ceiling, instead, we offer our information to them to make an educated decision on what is the best route for them. Many of our customers that elected to push the envelope had it in their mindset to build an engine anyways, regardless of if, or when it broke. Being this customer specifically road races the car, we educated him on the reasoning behind scaling the power back to ensure durability, but the upgraded turbos will still have benefits beyond the HP and TQ numbers. And now, when he upgrades his engine after, he can really enjoy those turbos :)

explorergotoluvit

LMS Questoin

On your xsport have you had a engine failure? if not what are the HP/TQ number on it? what mods are on it as well?
2013 explorer sport
LMS tuner stat 160 3 bar magna flow v8 91 map
k&n H&R spring
retrofit FXR bi-xenon projectors done by lightwerkz 
all lights replaced with leds from daytimebrightlites