• Welcome to Ecoboost Performance Forum. Please log in or sign up.
collapse

New something in the works

Started by SHOnUup, July 06, 2016, 10:20:11 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

SHOnUup

Feedback from a buddies contact...these are just thoughts



Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

2011 Sterling Gray Metallic SHO non PP,
12.4211 @ 110.28 Livernois 3bar tune & CAI,
Added since...PPE catless Dpipes, Megan coilovers, Powergrid adjustable end links, and EBC slotted rotors and red stuff pads.
Tommy Designs grille with carbon fiber hydrographics, fender badges and fog bezels hydrodipped also, tinted windows, head & taillights, debadged trunk with all chrome plasti-dipped, black calipers, obdlink mx scantool running torque pro on 7" tablet.

AJP turbo

You could control it the same way the other people control the meth kits....these cars actually have very repeatable results......but even the tuning and datalogs a shitty in my opinion for all meth kits so far....all you have to do is look at stft's


Anything over 5% is crappy
SCT Dealer/Custom Calibrator                        
Specializing in 3.5 Ecoboost   
Remote/email custom tuning including E85 blends 
Authorized retailer for all SCT devices. 
 
Former:2014 PP SHO
3 bar 93 tune, Airaid, Stainless Works non catted DP's  
405whp/520tq
Dyno
     
Current:2016 F150 2.7 Ecoboost
Tuning in progress

FoMoCoSHO

Quote from: SHOnUup on July 06, 2016, 05:03:33 PM
Feedback from a buddies contact...these are just thoughts



Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
I'm not sure but how would you access the pwm data?

We can't even read it because no one supports DMRs yet.

AJP turbo

Quote from: FoMoCoSHO on July 06, 2016, 06:34:35 PM
Quote from: SHOnUup on July 06, 2016, 05:03:33 PM
Feedback from a buddies contact...these are just thoughts



Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
I'm not sure but how would you access the pwm data?

We can't even read it because no one supports DMRs yet.

That comes from the controller for the meth kits and probably is determined from the duty cycle or something....it wouldnt be loggable through live link
SCT Dealer/Custom Calibrator                        
Specializing in 3.5 Ecoboost   
Remote/email custom tuning including E85 blends 
Authorized retailer for all SCT devices. 
 
Former:2014 PP SHO
3 bar 93 tune, Airaid, Stainless Works non catted DP's  
405whp/520tq
Dyno
     
Current:2016 F150 2.7 Ecoboost
Tuning in progress

FoMoCoSHO

How do you intercept the signal?

The injectors are directly driven from the ECU.

AJP turbo

#20
Im talking about the injectors for the meth kit...they would be ran from the controller i guess
SCT Dealer/Custom Calibrator                        
Specializing in 3.5 Ecoboost   
Remote/email custom tuning including E85 blends 
Authorized retailer for all SCT devices. 
 
Former:2014 PP SHO
3 bar 93 tune, Airaid, Stainless Works non catted DP's  
405whp/520tq
Dyno
     
Current:2016 F150 2.7 Ecoboost
Tuning in progress

sholxgt

Some random thoughts from someone that's old school...

First let me say that I love Direct Port anything.  It does provide better distribution and can, ultimately, flow more volume given a certain safety level due to the better distribution and ability to fine tune.

That being said, this kind of reminds me of all of the people that say intakes weren't meant for liquids and there would be puddling and poor distribution, etc.  The reality is I've NEVER had a nitrous related issue using a single fogger nozzle on any motor...be it a 5.0, 3.0 SHO, 2.5 Nissan, 4.0 Aurora v8, etc.  I'm sure any of those cars would have been happy with a single meth nozzle as well.

The one time I did run a direct port nitrous set up, the car didn't go .1 quicker in the quarter with equal total nitrous.  I actually lost a tiny bit of ET likely due to not getting as hard of a hit that the plate provided (that was on a carbureted car).  The car did later pick up quite a bit, but that was with the use of bigger pills and more total nitrous.

My point is that this set up makes sense if you plan on running a substantial amount of meth, but is that a good idea?  I don't think I'd want to run a water/meth mix at that point for fear of washing down the cylinders.  Is this being designed with the idea of running 100% meth?  That would seem to increase the risk of a bad day if the pump fails or the reservoir runs dry.

I do love the eye candy though and like to see people pushing the platform further.  I'm just not certain that this will result in better performance on mild builds.  Maybe best used by those looking to push the envelope.
Current - 2019 F150 Platinum FX4 3.5 EB
Formerly -2013 MKS Ecoboost Premium
PPE Catted DP's, 170 Reische TS, K&N Drop In, AJP Tune only at track - 12.87@106

SHOnUup

Well it didn't take long...





Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

2011 Sterling Gray Metallic SHO non PP,
12.4211 @ 110.28 Livernois 3bar tune & CAI,
Added since...PPE catless Dpipes, Megan coilovers, Powergrid adjustable end links, and EBC slotted rotors and red stuff pads.
Tommy Designs grille with carbon fiber hydrographics, fender badges and fog bezels hydrodipped also, tinted windows, head & taillights, debadged trunk with all chrome plasti-dipped, black calipers, obdlink mx scantool running torque pro on 7" tablet.

J-Will

Any updates?

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

2014 Factory Order SHO (non pp) Deep Impact Blue
Gearhead Automotive Performance Tune
3-bar
SP-542 plugs w/ GH gap