• Welcome to Ecoboost Performance Forum. Please log in or sign up.
collapse

Here is a video of my race with a 2012-2013 Mustang 5.0

Started by SHO-TYM, July 14, 2014, 01:42:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4
User actions

wasinger3000

#30
July 15, 2014, 12:30:14 PM
Quote from: Brucelinc on July 15, 2014, 12:01:00 PM
Everyone I know who uses Torque reports slower times than they should be.  I am not sure what the deal is but I have seen it many times.  Maybe the Aeroforce gauge is optimistic but a friend of mine with one has compared it with 2 other measuring tools and found it to be quite accurate. 

When totally stock, I was around 5.2 - 5.3 which is very much in line with the magazine road tests.
What's weird is with what I have done and running a e30 tune torque shows a 5.8 or around there. I know I'm not that slow lol. With live link before my e30 tune I saw a flat 5. Which still seems slow.. idk... I need a solid measuring device.   
13' SHO, Non-PP, Tuned by Torrie, Meth injection, 3 bar, 170* stat, custom axle back exhaust, Prosport Boost gauge.
15' F150 Lariat Sport, all the options, 3.5L Eco. (fiancée ride.)
13' GTCS, will be missed.

ShoBoat

#31
July 15, 2014, 01:22:10 PM

Quote from: wasinger3000 on July 15, 2014, 12:30:14 PM
Quote from: Brucelinc on July 15, 2014, 12:01:00 PM
Everyone I know who uses Torque reports slower times than they should be.  I am not sure what the deal is but I have seen it many times.  Maybe the Aeroforce gauge is optimistic but a friend of mine with one has compared it with 2 other measuring tools and found it to be quite accurate. 

When totally stock, I was around 5.2 - 5.3 which is very much in line with the magazine road tests.
What's weird is with what I have done and running a e30 tune torque shows a 5.8 or around there. I know I'm not that slow lol. With live link before my e30 tune I saw a flat 5. Which still seems slow.. idk... I need a solid measuring device.

dynolicious


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2012 Pearl White CTS-V Stock
2016 Fusion Titanium 2.0 EB Stock
2013 SHO Black on Black (Gone) PP, Unleashed Custom Tune, 170 TStat, SP534 Plugs, 3 Bar, Airaid Intake, PPE catted downpipes, Corsa Cat-back, H&R Springs. Focal 165KR Front Stage,2 JL W6 10 with Focal 800.1. 12.62 @ 110 mph.

SHOnUup

#32
July 15, 2014, 02:09:39 PM
Quote from: wasinger3000 on July 15, 2014, 12:30:14 PM
Quote from: Brucelinc on July 15, 2014, 12:01:00 PM
Everyone I know who uses Torque reports slower times than they should be.  I am not sure what the deal is but I have seen it many times.  Maybe the Aeroforce gauge is optimistic but a friend of mine with one has compared it with 2 other measuring tools and found it to be quite accurate. 

When totally stock, I was around 5.2 - 5.3 which is very much in line with the magazine road tests.
What's weird is with what I have done and running a e30 tune torque shows a 5.8 or around there. I know I'm not that slow lol. With live link before my e30 tune I saw a flat 5. Which still seems slow.. idk... I need a solid measuring device.
Just used torque 60 time out testing the brakes and got a 5.4 and a 5.6...way slow
2011 Sterling Gray Metallic SHO non PP,
12.4211 @ 110.28 Livernois 3bar tune & CAI,
Added since...PPE catless Dpipes, Megan coilovers, Powergrid adjustable end links, and EBC slotted rotors and red stuff pads.
Tommy Designs grille with carbon fiber hydrographics, fender badges and fog bezels hydrodipped also, tinted windows, head & taillights, debadged trunk with all chrome plasti-dipped, black calipers, obdlink mx scantool running torque pro on 7" tablet.

wasinger3000

#33
July 15, 2014, 02:14:31 PM
Quote from: SHOnUup on July 15, 2014, 02:09:39 PM
Quote from: wasinger3000 on July 15, 2014, 12:30:14 PM
Quote from: Brucelinc on July 15, 2014, 12:01:00 PM
Everyone I know who uses Torque reports slower times than they should be.  I am not sure what the deal is but I have seen it many times.  Maybe the Aeroforce gauge is optimistic but a friend of mine with one has compared it with 2 other measuring tools and found it to be quite accurate. 

When totally stock, I was around 5.2 - 5.3 which is very much in line with the magazine road tests.
What's weird is with what I have done and running a e30 tune torque shows a 5.8 or around there. I know I'm not that slow lol. With live link before my e30 tune I saw a flat 5. Which still seems slow.. idk... I need a solid measuring device.
Just used torque 60 time out testing the brakes and got a 5.4 and a 5.6...way slow
Ok good. Hah. I thought I was the only one.
13' SHO, Non-PP, Tuned by Torrie, Meth injection, 3 bar, 170* stat, custom axle back exhaust, Prosport Boost gauge.
15' F150 Lariat Sport, all the options, 3.5L Eco. (fiancée ride.)
13' GTCS, will be missed.

Brucelinc

#34
July 15, 2014, 02:15:55 PM
Quote from: SHOnUup on July 15, 2014, 02:09:39 PM
Quote from: wasinger3000 on July 15, 2014, 12:30:14 PM
Quote from: Brucelinc on July 15, 2014, 12:01:00 PM
Everyone I know who uses Torque reports slower times than they should be.  I am not sure what the deal is but I have seen it many times.  Maybe the Aeroforce gauge is optimistic but a friend of mine with one has compared it with 2 other measuring tools and found it to be quite accurate. 

When totally stock, I was around 5.2 - 5.3 which is very much in line with the magazine road tests.
What's weird is with what I have done and running a e30 tune torque shows a 5.8 or around there. I know I'm not that slow lol. With live link before my e30 tune I saw a flat 5. Which still seems slow.. idk... I need a solid measuring device.
Just used torque 60 time out testing the brakes and got a 5.4 and a 5.6...way slow

Yes, with your quarter mile ET, your 0-60 should be around 4 flat or better.  There is a calculator on one of the threads that shows what 0-60 would be based on the quarter mile ET and maybe some other criteria.

SHOnUup

#35
July 15, 2014, 02:16:11 PM
I notice my torque MPH gauge is a couple MPH behind car gauge too?
2011 Sterling Gray Metallic SHO non PP,
12.4211 @ 110.28 Livernois 3bar tune & CAI,
Added since...PPE catless Dpipes, Megan coilovers, Powergrid adjustable end links, and EBC slotted rotors and red stuff pads.
Tommy Designs grille with carbon fiber hydrographics, fender badges and fog bezels hydrodipped also, tinted windows, head & taillights, debadged trunk with all chrome plasti-dipped, black calipers, obdlink mx scantool running torque pro on 7" tablet.

SHOnUup

#36
July 15, 2014, 02:22:46 PM
Funny thing is I coasted the last couple hundred feet of 1/4 mile and still hit a 13.7
2011 Sterling Gray Metallic SHO non PP,
12.4211 @ 110.28 Livernois 3bar tune & CAI,
Added since...PPE catless Dpipes, Megan coilovers, Powergrid adjustable end links, and EBC slotted rotors and red stuff pads.
Tommy Designs grille with carbon fiber hydrographics, fender badges and fog bezels hydrodipped also, tinted windows, head & taillights, debadged trunk with all chrome plasti-dipped, black calipers, obdlink mx scantool running torque pro on 7" tablet.

Brucelinc

#37
July 15, 2014, 02:59:49 PM
You mean 12.7, right....as in your signature?

SHOnUup

#38
July 15, 2014, 03:09:17 PM
Not coasting to 12.7 for sure...but a 5.8 60 mph time to a coasted 13.7 sounds off...the 12.75 was at Milan Dragway
2011 Sterling Gray Metallic SHO non PP,
12.4211 @ 110.28 Livernois 3bar tune & CAI,
Added since...PPE catless Dpipes, Megan coilovers, Powergrid adjustable end links, and EBC slotted rotors and red stuff pads.
Tommy Designs grille with carbon fiber hydrographics, fender badges and fog bezels hydrodipped also, tinted windows, head & taillights, debadged trunk with all chrome plasti-dipped, black calipers, obdlink mx scantool running torque pro on 7" tablet.

ecoboostsho

#39
July 15, 2014, 03:22:44 PM
Quote from: SHOnUup on July 15, 2014, 02:16:11 PM
I notice my torque MPH gauge is a couple MPH behind car gauge too?
Depending on how many PIDs you are monitoring Torque can get laggy...but there are a few factors at play.  The first is the hardware you are running it on...then there is Bluetooth connection quality, number of PIDs/calculations, alarms, and finally any logging you are actually doing to the SD card.  I minimize my gauges to exactly what is needed but still don't trust Torque for 0-60 times.
2013 White SHO w/PP, Gearhead Tuned, 3 Bar, 160T, Plugs...Mess with the Bull and you'll get the Horn. :)
Previous 2011 Tuxedo Black SHO w/PP - 12.89 1/4 Mile

Brucelinc

#40
July 15, 2014, 03:40:10 PM
I haven't run a full quarter mile with the new 4X tune yet but here is what my Aeroforce gauge showed with the 4+.  I am not claiming that it is as accurate as putting the car on a dragstrip and getting a timeslip but I don't have a strip close by.

SHOnUup

#41
July 15, 2014, 03:59:30 PM
Quote from: Brucelinc on July 15, 2014, 03:40:10 PM
I haven't run a full quarter mile with the new 4X tune yet but here is what my Aeroforce gauge showed with the 4+.  I am not claiming that it is as accurate as putting the car on a dragstrip and getting a timeslip but I don't have a strip close by.


Those kind of #'s have to be a tad bit exciting though!!!
2011 Sterling Gray Metallic SHO non PP,
12.4211 @ 110.28 Livernois 3bar tune & CAI,
Added since...PPE catless Dpipes, Megan coilovers, Powergrid adjustable end links, and EBC slotted rotors and red stuff pads.
Tommy Designs grille with carbon fiber hydrographics, fender badges and fog bezels hydrodipped also, tinted windows, head & taillights, debadged trunk with all chrome plasti-dipped, black calipers, obdlink mx scantool running torque pro on 7" tablet.

SHOnUup

#42
July 15, 2014, 04:02:24 PM
My 12.75 had an 1/8 at 8.2 (85.85) and 1/4 at 108.43...1/8 looks right on but the mph for 1/4 seems a little off
2011 Sterling Gray Metallic SHO non PP,
12.4211 @ 110.28 Livernois 3bar tune & CAI,
Added since...PPE catless Dpipes, Megan coilovers, Powergrid adjustable end links, and EBC slotted rotors and red stuff pads.
Tommy Designs grille with carbon fiber hydrographics, fender badges and fog bezels hydrodipped also, tinted windows, head & taillights, debadged trunk with all chrome plasti-dipped, black calipers, obdlink mx scantool running torque pro on 7" tablet.

SHOnUup

#43
July 15, 2014, 04:06:59 PM
Quote from: wasinger3000 on July 15, 2014, 10:06:30 AM
Oh yeah? I'm running the 4++++. It's super aggressive. Pretty much hit warp speed the other day.
This is a pic of car exiting warp speed!
2011 Sterling Gray Metallic SHO non PP,
12.4211 @ 110.28 Livernois 3bar tune & CAI,
Added since...PPE catless Dpipes, Megan coilovers, Powergrid adjustable end links, and EBC slotted rotors and red stuff pads.
Tommy Designs grille with carbon fiber hydrographics, fender badges and fog bezels hydrodipped also, tinted windows, head & taillights, debadged trunk with all chrome plasti-dipped, black calipers, obdlink mx scantool running torque pro on 7" tablet.

Brucelinc

#44
July 15, 2014, 04:16:18 PM
I thought my speed in the quarter was off, too, compared to the ET.  However, with the 4+, I felt like the car ran out of breath around 5700 RPM in 3rd gear but it doesn't shift until 6200.  I honestly think I would have had a higher trap speed if I could have shifted to 4th gear a little sooner.   If I recall, it doesn't shift into 4th until nearly 100 MPH. 

With the 4+, I got the highest boost in 1st gear, a little bit less in 2nd and still less in 3rd.  I am not sure why, but that is what the gauge showed.  It seems that with the 4X, I get the same boost in each gear so I think it will be better.  I just haven't had a chance to run the new tune all the way through the quarter.  The last time I was at my test site, there were deer beside the road so I wasn't too comfortable doing triple digit speeds there.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4
User actions