Quote from: BiGMaC on January 12, 2014, 12:49:25 PM
Lanson... if I stayed with 20's (not in the Barbados!) do you think the 265 width will allow clearances? I like the idea of an inch more ground contact with enough sidewall to preserve ride with maybe a 35-40 width to maintain the rolling diameter and sidewall pretty constant without spacers? TIA
BTW, I'm personally influenced regarding these wheels previously 40 years ago! The problem with the Barbados for me is that they look almost exactly like the wheel covers I had on a 1969 Toyota Crown in high school, which I changed quickly then 'cuz I didn't like them (Like the SHO it was a sleeper... had the Celica drive train in a sedan.
I wouldn't try to run this wheel in 20". Actually, I don't think I'd run this wheel at all. It reminds me of... forgive me for this... gangsta rap bling. It is also a very, very heavy wheel. I see them on Bentleys and Rollers, but if I had a B or Rolls I would have a 3 piece custom full-face wheel fabbed up for it, and stay with a cleaner design. Aside from the MRR's I should you (which also fit in 20" just fine), I would go with a Japanese VIP, or Rotiform forged if I wanted a nice full-face wheel.
Now, regarding fit on any 20" wheel, I would say a 245/45-20 front and 275/40-20 rear is the ticket. That size is a 100% perfect match in circumference. If going 22's, there is no safe match that is close which is why I suggested the 265/35-22 all the way around.
Visually, I don't think the SHO has the look to pull off a full-face wheel exceptionally. I see concave spokes, 5 stars, and mesh wheels visually working with the car. Heavy, lumbering cars with a "low and slow" attitude befit the full-face wheel better, I think. In the WTW lineup, I am crushing over the Dramadio RL lately.