• Welcome to Ecoboost Performance Forum. Please log in or sign up.
collapse

2013 SHO PP Or No PP

Started by navbtcret, November 25, 2013, 11:55:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

DJE624

I guess that means either way you go, you'll be happy! 

SwampRat

It would be interesting to know if any of the car mags did a comparison between the two  .....
2013 SHO  ....  not mine anymore

2021 Edge ST

BiGMaC

What beck said... Great Idea!

•2013 Taurus SHO nonPP - All Ford factory options, 3BAR MAP, LMS v8 tune (mods for 3BAR, DPs, and T-stat), Paint & plastic correction, CQuart finest all exterior surfaces, limo black window tint,VLED Triton switchbacks, Daytime BrightLites switchback DRLs, full interior and exterior LED conversion, Lamin-X charcoal blackout tail lights and reflectors, PPE catted and coated downpipes, EBPP coated hotpipes with BoVs VTA, MDesign CAI
•2013 F250 CC Lariat 6.7EB Diesel -stock

navbtcret

I am the new owner of a 2013 non PP Tri whatever the crap Ford calls it white. I'll be ordering the tuner, thermostat and plug for it tomorrow. It now has 127 miles on it from driving it home from the dealership. I opted more for the comfort than the additional performance of the PP. Although the PP was nice it did not have some of the options that I really wanted on it and those were more important to me than an extra tenth or two at the strip. I gave up chasing ET's a few years ago. Just want some 12's which I am sure a tune and meth will give me.

Thanks for all the input and info so far.


From what I have read here a CAI really does nothing for you. I have a friend with a Flex and he said his ET was slower after installing a cai and faster after taking it back off.
2013 SHO Non PP, LMS 93 Performance v8, 3 Bar MAP, 170 Stat, MDesign CAI, Hot Pipes with TiAL BOV, PPE Catted Downpipes

DJE624

Congratulations!  Good Luck and Enjoy!  You should get into the 12's with just a tune and K&N panel (or very close like me! LOL). The meth will push you deeper into the 12's if you want to do that. 

Dxlnt1

Silly question. What is PP or NON PP? I'm the new kid on the block, so just learning the lingo.
2011 SHO, 3 Bar, AJP Turbo-Tune, ACES IV, Boostane 170 T-stat, PPE Catted DP's, Alpine Sound system, Touch screen HVAC controls, full window tint

Frozen Taurus

Quote from: Dxlnt1 on November 29, 2013, 09:12:46 PM
Silly question. What is PP or NON PP? I'm the new kid on the block, so just learning the lingo.

Performance package vs non Performance Package
2011 Tuxedo Black SHO non PP, K&N drop in, TCE Big Brake Kit, Megan Racing Coilovers
My other car is a 447 awhp Talon

SRT82ECOBOOST

Bottom line  is if you want less performance, go non-PP.
2013 SHO PP in White Platinum Metallic Tricoat, PPE Downpipes, Livernois Stage V8/3 Bar, Custom 2.5" Catback, 170 T-stat, Airaid CAI, H+R Springs and debadged
Boston Acoustics 2.1 Audio Upgrade

DJE624

You got any dynos or time slips to back that up? :boxing: ;D

bpd1151

#24
I wouldn't necessarily say that the Non-PP offers less performance.

There has been no definitive distinctions in the gear ratio differences (2.77 for the Non-PP, versus the 3.16 for the PP pkg) as it relates to overall performance.

Bar none, the biggest differences between the two pkg's (at least for 2013 model years, and beyond) is that the PP pkg option includes all the auxiliary coolers for the trans, the oil, and the ptu.

Adding those, allows you essentially to have a true, track ready car. As FMC has so touted.

The additional differences beyond the above, are the better brake pads, & slightly better suspension. Those are the biggest differences.

But as the 1st person to retro-fit the auxiliary coolers onto a Non-PP pkg SHO (of which, the changes are easily performed) I can attest that the differences then become neglible.

Some of us 2010-2012 owners (both Non-PP & PP) have shown on the track, that there are no differences in performance between the two.

Sent from my DROID3 using Tapatalk 2

SRT82ECOBOOST

2013 SHO PP in White Platinum Metallic Tricoat, PPE Downpipes, Livernois Stage V8/3 Bar, Custom 2.5" Catback, 170 T-stat, Airaid CAI, H+R Springs and debadged
Boston Acoustics 2.1 Audio Upgrade

DJE624

#26
What we really need would be dynos and time slips stock vs. stock.   Pretty sure the dynos would be too close to call.   The lower gearing of the PP may launch better if you get it all to the ground but what happens after you've wound out first and second?  I don't think the gearing helps any after that.

navbtcret

After I got home last night with the car, one of my daughters friends has a 2013 SHO non PP with Livernois's tune on it and a drop in K&N filter. He came by the house and let me take that for a ride, now stock the car is pretty peppy but night and day compared to a tuned vehicle. I have my tuner ordered already along with a thermostat and plug. I should be wrenching on the car next week with less than 500 mile it. Gotta love modding cars.
2013 SHO Non PP, LMS 93 Performance v8, 3 Bar MAP, 170 Stat, MDesign CAI, Hot Pipes with TiAL BOV, PPE Catted Downpipes

FoMoCoSHO


68_GT

love my PP and I recall talking to the guys at LMS and when I ordered my tuner I was told they noticed the PP cars responded better to the tune what ever that means. Honsetly though I'd probably trade my stiffer PP suspension for a non PP suspension. It rides a little too harsh for my daily driver. I'll never autocross the car so I'll never take advantage of it's suspension anyway. Now here and there it is nice to take a corner with but not really worth the bouncy / harsh daily ride.
2013 PP SHO LMS 93V10 tune, 170* T stat, 3bar, K&N drop in, plugs re-gapped, 4in exhaust tips.
UPDATE - 130K miles =blown engine. Unleashed tune and EBPP upgrade turbo billet wheels / Turbo Smart WGA's on a bran new long block. Let's get this SHO on the road !

2013 Fusion Titanium 2.0 EB daily driver ;) - LMS 93 tune and CPE intercooler