I guess I'm just imagining how ford engineers would select different dampers and springs for the flex vs the sho. i would imagine the 2 extremes which are a fully unloaded sho rear-end vs a fully loaded flex rear-end. in my mind that would be a potential difference of ~700 lbs. of extra people and/or bags of mulch from Lowe's. i feel like you would want a way different amount pre-load and amount of compression travel, and in my mind an adjustable shock may help dynamically, but not static situations.
i understand that megan designed them for the potentially loaded up flex, so this would mean the springs might be too stiff for the sho.
The eibachs and H&R's are moderately shorter and stiffer than oem, but designed for the same spring load/force. i dont know how much stiffer rear springs would affect handling.
i know i may be splitting hairs here, but its mostly because i want my car to look good AND be extremely safe. i dont want some sudden loss of control in the rear end.
anyone have experience with a car that had too stiff of springs in the rear?
Im sure these springs will be good for drag racing, almost acting like the rear helper airbags. but i am more concerned about affecting the safety of my daily driver. does anyone know the spring specs for the rear of the megan kit?