A few people have asked me for my input since I have now run the Megans and HR's.
Initial thoughts are that I really like the HR's way better than the Megans. The HR's handle well right out of the box without needing to tinker/adjust the dampeners, preload, ride height that is required with the Megans. I was NOT impressed with the built quality of the Megans AT ALL and there was a lot of slop on the dampener adjustments that always left me wondering...
I took the SHO out for a nice long ride last night and so far the HR's ride very close to stock feel with a slight bit more feel for the road and way less body roll..and I haven't yet experienced any pogo'ing that some people experience, but the roads around my place are really good.
Couple disclosures..
1: The Megans I purchased were LATEST model which is very different than the first run they produced.
2: My current SHO is a PP vs the NON-PP 2010 I previously owned.
3: The suspension still needs to settle, hence why I said INITIAL.
4: When I installed my Megans I never had them professionally adjusted or corner balanced. I am sure there was room for improvement.
5: Mike at EPP said he no longer sells the Megan coilovers due to quality issues.
For the cost difference thus far, HR seems a better bang for the buck IMHO.
And the shop that installed them said they needed to use the longer camber bolts to bring it back into spec. I DID NOT need those on my 2010 as the Megans were able to be brought into alignment without them.