• Welcome to Ecoboost Performance Forum. Please log in or sign up.
collapse

new weird observation.. low launches == better time to 105 than 2k launches ????

Started by TopherSho, May 11, 2017, 07:51:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

TopherSho

Just as the title spells out.. I can consistently get better times to 105mph (should be 1/4 mile time equivalent) by launching at much lower rpms, BUT it drops my 0-60 by 2 tenths.. (4.7-4.8 avg)..

if i launch at 1900-2000 rpm i can get 4.6x seconds 0-60 pretty reliably on dry land.. BUT then it utterly TANKS my 0-105mph time to the tune of 13.x+

super weird..

i noticed in reviewing my old datalogs that one fine day on the 29th of april i did a run from 0-105mph in 12.66 seconds.  every other log on earth has me at 13.xx+

so for giggles today i tried another low launch.  i tried for the same 1200rpm launch as in the older datalog.. but missed and did a 1600 rpm launch.  i swear it was slower feeling than a 2k launch.  yet .. boom we have a 12.9x 0-105mph.. which should be super close to my new 1/4 mile times.

obviously i am super confused.

there is not ANY tire-spin in the 2k launch.. just a hint of a chirp on the 1-2 for both logs.

wha???  AJP save me from this madness!
2010 non-pp, 98k miles, 3-bar,  .026 plugs, SNOW-KIT STG1, AJPTurbu tune#35, 15.5+psi
Best 0-60 public road 4.35s
Best 1/4 of 12.61 no DA correction

StealBlueSho

I think... the best way to prove that out would be a track with 60ft times...

Rich I believe said he launches around 2K RPMs and has managed low 12's..

TopherSho

Quote from: StealBlueSho on May 11, 2017, 07:56:00 PM
I think... the best way to prove that out would be a track with 60ft times...

Rich I believe said he launches around 2K RPMs and has managed low 12's..

oh I believe him.   I mean the 0-60 is way better with a 2k launch for me.. i'm baffled.  nothing about this car makes sense yet :P which is likely due to me being new to boosted power.

2010 non-pp, 98k miles, 3-bar,  .026 plugs, SNOW-KIT STG1, AJPTurbu tune#35, 15.5+psi
Best 0-60 public road 4.35s
Best 1/4 of 12.61 no DA correction

FoMoCoSHO

I'm gonna go with heat as the culprit.....low rpm launch, slower heat build up.

StealBlueSho

Quote from: FoMoCoSHO on May 11, 2017, 09:29:56 PM
I'm gonna go with heat as the culprit.....low rpm launch, slower heat build up.

You think? I mean the launching difference of say 800 RPMs I wouldn't think would make that much difference in IATs.. unless your holding the RPMs longer...

FoMoCoSHO

Id look at boost levels at each rpm.....it doesn't take much boost to make a bunch of heat with nothing flowing through the IC....

TopherSho

are you suggesting that brake boosting is building to much heat in the system other than the IAT?
2010 non-pp, 98k miles, 3-bar,  .026 plugs, SNOW-KIT STG1, AJPTurbu tune#35, 15.5+psi
Best 0-60 public road 4.35s
Best 1/4 of 12.61 no DA correction

SHOdded

2007 Ford Edge SEL, Powerstop F/R Brake Kit, TXT LED 6000K Lo & Hi Beams, W16W LED Reverse Bulbs, 3BSpec 2.5w Map Lights, 5W Cree rear dome lights, 5W Cree cargo light, DTBL LED Taillights

If tuned:  Take note of the strategy code as you return to stock (including 3 bar MAP to 2 bar MAP) -> take car in & get it serviced -> check strategy code when you get car back -> have tuner update your tune if the strategy code has changed -> reload tune -> ENJOY!

FoMoCoSHO

Quote from: TopherSho on May 11, 2017, 09:47:04 PM
are you suggesting that brake boosting is building to much heat in the system other than the IAT?


I would say this would start to heat soak IAT2@ right off the bat. The more boost you put through that intercooler without any airflow the hotter IAT2 heats up before you start moving.  Your intercooler is starting to heat soaking when you launch. The higher boost launch gets the initial boost advantage but loses spark up top, the low boost launch is reversed.

I want to loosen up my IAT2 compensations and let the E85 do more work as IAT2s rise. The higher the temps, the more heat it removes from the aircharge. The challenge is we can't see the cooling effects because unlike meth, it is happening in the cylinder. If needed, I can increase the amount of cooling with higher blends or increased enrichment as well.



10bird

If heat is slowing it down why is the 0-60 quicker with the boosted launch?

Macgyver


FoMoCoSHO


TopherSho

Quote from: FoMoCoSHO on May 12, 2017, 01:13:00 AM
Do you have the first log in csv format?

/facepalm/  posted the audit of the datalog in error .. here is the orignal csv
2010 non-pp, 98k miles, 3-bar,  .026 plugs, SNOW-KIT STG1, AJPTurbu tune#35, 15.5+psi
Best 0-60 public road 4.35s
Best 1/4 of 12.61 no DA correction

TopherSho

Quote from: SHOdded on May 11, 2017, 10:42:01 PM
Tires in good shape?  Is traction an issue?

tires are actually pretty good.  there less than 10k miles old.. 

i rarely have 1-2 traction loss unless it is colder or i launch like a lunatic.  even then it is not wheel spin per say but more a wheel hop for 100-200ms..

2010 non-pp, 98k miles, 3-bar,  .026 plugs, SNOW-KIT STG1, AJPTurbu tune#35, 15.5+psi
Best 0-60 public road 4.35s
Best 1/4 of 12.61 no DA correction

TopherSho

Quote from: FoMoCoSHO on May 11, 2017, 10:57:22 PM
Quote from: TopherSho on May 11, 2017, 09:47:04 PM
are you suggesting that brake boosting is building to much heat in the system other than the IAT?


I would say this would start to heat soak IAT2@ right off the bat. The more boost you put through that intercooler without any airflow the hotter IAT2 heats up before you start moving.  Your intercooler is starting to heat soaking when you launch. The higher boost launch gets the initial boost advantage but loses spark up top, the low boost launch is reversed.

I want to loosen up my IAT2 compensations and let the E85 do more work as IAT2s rise. The higher the temps, the more heat it removes from the aircharge. The challenge is we can't see the cooling effects because unlike meth, it is happening in the cylinder. If needed, I can increase the amount of cooling with higher blends or increased enrichment as well.

i am wondering this as well.  and not just the IAT2,  but the cylinder heads, and coolant in general.

i need to run more low rpm tests before the 170' t-stat comes in.  sadly it is going to rain here for DAYS,  and prevents me from going to the track to get a real third party performance metric.  by the time the rain stops well be in vega$ for a week ..

bah!  damn vacations interrupting my SHO-work ..

tired... good night all.. thank you for your ever ready thoughts on my insanity
2010 non-pp, 98k miles, 3-bar,  .026 plugs, SNOW-KIT STG1, AJPTurbu tune#35, 15.5+psi
Best 0-60 public road 4.35s
Best 1/4 of 12.61 no DA correction