Quote from: StinkinLinkin13 on May 21, 2018, 11:01:41 AM
That would help explain my poor fuel economy. I appreciate the safe approach but at the same time it's one of the reasons I'm hesitant to mod any further (meth, hpfp etc) on this type of canned tune. I don't want to get so crazy as to risk any engine failure. But at the same time I feel there is still quite a bit of potential left in the car with the current V11 tune without the need for those additional expensive mods. Its seems those mods are mostly a requirement because of the type of rich tuning they like to run. Plus they make some $$$ from them as well. Thanks for the feedback. Good info.
Shouldn't have poor fuel economy as they don't start enrichment until under full load. The tune tries to keep stoich 95% of the time...
I can tell you from personal experience, that the V11 tune pretty much maxes out what a 93 octane tune can push boost/spark wise... you can lean it out a bit and not run so rich but I am unsure how that will effect KR as I am sure part of the reason they are running rich is to help cool the cylinders to stave off knock... but AJPTurbo can provide much more information on that...
I have tunes from Brad from my 2010 SHO that max out the 93 octane tune running at .80 lambse and the load is very similar almost identical to the V11 tune from LMS. No doubt you individual car can be tweaked a bit more as each car is different.. but the gains are porbably not gonna be that much different...
now if you are looking to run E30 blends you might be able to squeeze a bit more more.. I will differ to Brad on this...