• Welcome to Ecoboost Performance Forum. Please log in or sign up.
collapse

Is this possible?

Started by Usmcsho, April 19, 2017, 08:12:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ShoBoat

Quote from: paokara777 on April 21, 2017, 11:18:59 AM
3.9 with just a tune?

I find that difficult to believe.

Dunno. Decent launch at the track maybe... mine does have DP, cat back, intake, stat and Tune I have the slips to prove it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2012 Pearl White CTS-V Stock
2016 Fusion Titanium 2.0 EB Stock
2013 SHO Black on Black (Gone) PP, Unleashed Custom Tune, 170 TStat, SP534 Plugs, 3 Bar, Airaid Intake, PPE catted downpipes, Corsa Cat-back, H&R Springs. Focal 165KR Front Stage,2 JL W6 10 with Focal 800.1. 12.62 @ 110 mph.

f8tlSHO

Quote from: ShoBoat on April 21, 2017, 05:46:54 PM
Quote from: paokara777 on April 21, 2017, 11:18:59 AM
3.9 with just a tune?

I find that difficult to believe.

Dunno. Decent launch at the track maybe... mine does have DP, cat back, intake, stat and Tune I have the slips to prove it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Slips to prove what? Track times? I've never seen a track supply 0-60 times. What did your car run at the track?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2013 Non PP Unleashed 93 E20 3 Bar Tune, K&N drop in 12.491 @ 110.96 120's IAT
Now tuned by ajp...looking to go faster
E30 tune on14psi full weight including 2 child seats,race like a real street car.
12.433 @110.8 140's IAT; Mustang Dyno 332hp / 386tq

ShoBoat

Calculation based off of 1/4 time 60 foot stuff like that, it's in my sig 12.6


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2012 Pearl White CTS-V Stock
2016 Fusion Titanium 2.0 EB Stock
2013 SHO Black on Black (Gone) PP, Unleashed Custom Tune, 170 TStat, SP534 Plugs, 3 Bar, Airaid Intake, PPE catted downpipes, Corsa Cat-back, H&R Springs. Focal 165KR Front Stage,2 JL W6 10 with Focal 800.1. 12.62 @ 110 mph.

SHOdded

Brucelinc's mks did 3.9s all day, based on the Aeroforce gauge.
2007 Ford Edge SEL, Powerstop F/R Brake Kit, TXT LED 6000K Lo & Hi Beams, W16W LED Reverse Bulbs, 3BSpec 2.5w Map Lights, 5W Cree rear dome lights, 5W Cree cargo light, DTBL LED Taillights

If tuned:  Take note of the strategy code as you return to stock (including 3 bar MAP to 2 bar MAP) -> take car in & get it serviced -> check strategy code when you get car back -> have tuner update your tune if the strategy code has changed -> reload tune -> ENJOY!

Brucelinc

Quote from: SHOdded on April 21, 2017, 06:25:30 PM
Brucelinc's mks did 3.9s all day, based on the Aeroforce gauge.

The drag times calculator bases a 0-60 estimate on 1/8 mile time and speed.   That agreed with the Aeroforce gauge within 4/100s of a second.   Rich's car has more mods now but his was under 4 seconds when all he had was just a tune.

f8tlSHO

How can you trust drag times calculations when you get bs numbers like this... my car ran a 12.4@111 with a 4.5 0-60 verified by my log... makes no sense how someone else smokes me by .6 0-60 but loses the race by .2... I'm calling bs on drag times


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2013 Non PP Unleashed 93 E20 3 Bar Tune, K&N drop in 12.491 @ 110.96 120's IAT
Now tuned by ajp...looking to go faster
E30 tune on14psi full weight including 2 child seats,race like a real street car.
12.433 @110.8 140's IAT; Mustang Dyno 332hp / 386tq

Brucelinc

#21
I don't trust your 4.5 result.  Are you saying that is the result you see from your logs?  If your car will run the quarter in 12.4, your 0-60 should be quicker than 4.5. For example, based on a road test in C&D, a Mustang GT does 0-60 in 4.4 and runs the quarter in 13.0.  I know damn well a tuned SHO will smoke a Mustang from 0-60.   I have raced plenty of them and always walk away from them on the low end.  They start gaining at about the 1/8 but can't quite catch me at the end of the quarter.

Where does the data come from that is on your log?  Does it obain the speed from the car's ecu?   I am not trying to be argumentative here but something is causing the 0-60 time you are seeing to be slow.  What is your 1/8 mile time and speed?  I think the drag times calculator is pretty accurate and will likely show your 0-60 under 4 seconds.


f8tlSHO

Quote from: Brucelinc on April 21, 2017, 09:48:50 PM
I don't trust your 4.5 result.  If your car will run the quarter in 12.4, your 0-60 should be quicker than 4.5. For example, based on a road test in C&D, a Mustang GT does 0-60 in 4.4 and runs the quarter in 13.0.  I know damn well a tuned SHO will smoke a Mustang from 0-60.   I have raced plenty of them and always walk away from them on the low end.  They start gaining at about the 1/8 but can't quite catch me at the end of the quarter.

Where does the data come from that is on your log?  Does it obain the speed from the car's ecu?   I am not trying to be argumentative here but something is causing the 0-60 time you are seeing to be slow.  What is your 1/8 mile time and speed?
Yes from ecu, I take the time at 0 miles per hour right before the car moves, then take the time at 60mph and subtract them... I don't know how much more accurate you can get.stock tire size and flower rims.
The log from this run is where I got the 4.5



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2013 Non PP Unleashed 93 E20 3 Bar Tune, K&N drop in 12.491 @ 110.96 120's IAT
Now tuned by ajp...looking to go faster
E30 tune on14psi full weight including 2 child seats,race like a real street car.
12.433 @110.8 140's IAT; Mustang Dyno 332hp / 386tq

ShoBoat

Just out of curiosity was the data wired or wifi/Bluetooth? A bit of lag is expected in a wireless setup. There are lots of examples here and out there of SHOs doing 0-60 in 4 or less.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2012 Pearl White CTS-V Stock
2016 Fusion Titanium 2.0 EB Stock
2013 SHO Black on Black (Gone) PP, Unleashed Custom Tune, 170 TStat, SP534 Plugs, 3 Bar, Airaid Intake, PPE catted downpipes, Corsa Cat-back, H&R Springs. Focal 165KR Front Stage,2 JL W6 10 with Focal 800.1. 12.62 @ 110 mph.

Colorado-SHOBro

Quote from: f8tlSHO on April 21, 2017, 10:14:15 PM
Quote from: Brucelinc on April 21, 2017, 09:48:50 PM
I don't trust your 4.5 result.  If your car will run the quarter in 12.4, your 0-60 should be quicker than 4.5. For example, based on a road test in C&D, a Mustang GT does 0-60 in 4.4 and runs the quarter in 13.0.  I know damn well a tuned SHO will smoke a Mustang from 0-60.   I have raced plenty of them and always walk away from them on the low end.  They start gaining at about the 1/8 but can't quite catch me at the end of the quarter.

Where does the data come from that is on your log?  Does it obain the speed from the car's ecu?   I am not trying to be argumentative here but something is causing the 0-60 time you are seeing to be slow.  What is your 1/8 mile time and speed?
Yes from ecu, I take the time at 0 miles per hour right before the car moves, then take the time at 60mph and subtract them... I don't know how much more accurate you can get.stock tire size and flower rims.
The log from this run is where I got the 4.5



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mind posting the log f8tl? Here's mine from tonight that produced a 4.5sec 0-60 . . @ ~6000ft DA.
also, this site is rumored to be the most accurate for calculating 0-60 times from 1/8th times/traps. i would trust it must more than drag times calculator
http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php
although when i put in my time slip info it tells me 4.6 and the log  from the same run tells me 5.0sec. . then again the site doesn't compensate for altitude so i'm sure that's a factor.
11' SHO Tuxedo Metallic black-non PP | Highly sophisticated high altitude custom AJP Turbo E30 3Bar tune w/Wastegate mod | Cat'd ceramic PPE downpipes |170 stat| SP542 plugs .028 | PP trans cooler | H&R springs | RX catch can

12.8@108 @ 6,000ft DA.

Gjkrisa

Quote from: f8tlSHO on April 21, 2017, 08:31:03 PM
How can you trust drag times calculations when you get bs numbers like this... my car ran a 12.4@111 with a 4.5 0-60 verified by my log... makes no sense how someone else smokes me by .6 0-60 but loses the race by .2... I'm calling bs on drag times


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't forget to calculate driver weight and anything else that maybe in the car

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

2016 Taurus SHO pp Shadow Black
diy emblems,jms boost max, FORscan modder

f8tlSHO

Quote from: ShoBoat on April 21, 2017, 10:56:13 PM
Just out of curiosity was the data wired or wifi/Bluetooth? A bit of lag is expected in a wireless setup. There are lots of examples here and out there of SHOs doing 0-60 in 4 or less.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wired directly to my sct x4


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2013 Non PP Unleashed 93 E20 3 Bar Tune, K&N drop in 12.491 @ 110.96 120's IAT
Now tuned by ajp...looking to go faster
E30 tune on14psi full weight including 2 child seats,race like a real street car.
12.433 @110.8 140's IAT; Mustang Dyno 332hp / 386tq

f8tlSHO

Quote from: Gjkrisa on April 21, 2017, 11:57:04 PM
Quote from: f8tlSHO on April 21, 2017, 08:31:03 PM
How can you trust drag times calculations when you get bs numbers like this... my car ran a 12.4@111 with a 4.5 0-60 verified by my log... makes no sense how someone else smokes me by .6 0-60 but loses the race by .2... I'm calling bs on drag times


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't forget to calculate driver weight and anything else that maybe in the car

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Add at least 200 lbs + then.... even slower..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2013 Non PP Unleashed 93 E20 3 Bar Tune, K&N drop in 12.491 @ 110.96 120's IAT
Now tuned by ajp...looking to go faster
E30 tune on14psi full weight including 2 child seats,race like a real street car.
12.433 @110.8 140's IAT; Mustang Dyno 332hp / 386tq

f8tlSHO

Quote from: Colorado-SHOBro on April 21, 2017, 11:13:38 PM
Quote from: f8tlSHO on April 21, 2017, 10:14:15 PM
Quote from: Brucelinc on April 21, 2017, 09:48:50 PM
I don't trust your 4.5 result.  If your car will run the quarter in 12.4, your 0-60 should be quicker than 4.5. For example, based on a road test in C&D, a Mustang GT does 0-60 in 4.4 and runs the quarter in 13.0.  I know damn well a tuned SHO will smoke a Mustang from 0-60.   I have raced plenty of them and always walk away from them on the low end.  They start gaining at about the 1/8 but can't quite catch me at the end of the quarter.

Where does the data come from that is on your log?  Does it obain the speed from the car's ecu?   I am not trying to be argumentative here but something is causing the 0-60 time you are seeing to be slow.  What is your 1/8 mile time and speed?
Yes from ecu, I take the time at 0 miles per hour right before the car moves, then take the time at 60mph and subtract them... I don't know how much more accurate you can get.stock tire size and flower rims.
The log from this run is where I got the 4.5



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mind posting the log f8tl? Here's mine from tonight that produced a 4.5sec 0-60 . . @ ~6000ft DA.
also, this site is rumored to be the most accurate for calculating 0-60 times from 1/8th times/traps. i would trust it must more than drag times calculator
http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php
although when i put in my time slip info it tells me 4.6 and the log  from the same run tells me 5.0sec. . then again the site doesn't compensate for altitude so i'm sure that's a factor.
Yes I can post my log when I get to my computer, that site says 3.8 for my 0-60... which for sure I like that number better than 4.5, but I still think log info is going to be more accurate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2013 Non PP Unleashed 93 E20 3 Bar Tune, K&N drop in 12.491 @ 110.96 120's IAT
Now tuned by ajp...looking to go faster
E30 tune on14psi full weight including 2 child seats,race like a real street car.
12.433 @110.8 140's IAT; Mustang Dyno 332hp / 386tq

Brucelinc

Mind posting the log f8tl? Here's mine from tonight that produced a 4.5sec 0-60 . . @ ~6000ft DA.
also, this site is rumored to be the most accurate for calculating 0-60 times from 1/8th times/traps. i would trust it must more than drag times calculator
http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php
although when i put in my time slip info it tells me 4.6 and the log  from the same run tells me 5.0sec. . then again the site doesn't compensate for altitude so i'm sure that's a factor.

YES!!  I originally said the Drag Times calculator but I meant the Wallaceracing calculator!  That is the one that has been consistent with the Aeroforce gauge or simply making a video of a 0-60 run and using a stopwatch to measure it.