• Welcome to Ecoboost Performance Forum. Please log in or sign up.
collapse

Tune + Fuel Options

Started by 14SHOCAR, August 31, 2015, 10:22:50 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

SHOnUup

Quote from: ZSHO on October 06, 2015, 01:37:37 PM
Quote from: SHOnUup on October 06, 2015, 01:08:48 PM


Quote from: ZSHO on October 05, 2015, 09:56:33 PM
I have to travel to a different state in order to obtain E-85,what would be the most practical solution to add E-85 to a empty tank considering 93(E-10)is available and how much E-85 should be added to the mix,(before or after)apologize if this question was asked before,trying to prepare for the winter ***blend to kick in,thanks.  Z

To battle the winter blend only, not going after power. I think just a gallon of corn to 13-15 gallons of normal fuel should be sufficient to prevent pre-detonation.

Air tight canister is a must if storing for any amount of time due to its want to absorb water.

I always add my corn first, but I get it from the same station which makes it easy for me.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
What would you recommend for power gains,thanks.  Z
The max I mix is 20% when I'm looking for more power...but I'm starting to think a slightly lower mix may be better as of late...17% range. With winter blend knocking on the door, and quite possibly already appearing in places, this could move back towards the 20% range.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

2011 Sterling Gray Metallic SHO non PP,
12.4211 @ 110.28 Livernois 3bar tune & CAI,
Added since...PPE catless Dpipes, Megan coilovers, Powergrid adjustable end links, and EBC slotted rotors and red stuff pads.
Tommy Designs grille with carbon fiber hydrographics, fender badges and fog bezels hydrodipped also, tinted windows, head & taillights, debadged trunk with all chrome plasti-dipped, black calipers, obdlink mx scantool running torque pro on 7" tablet.

14SHOCAR

So I was going on the interstate and I'm starting to get that "popping again". I noticed that my car wasn't all the way warm before I laid into the throttle. After my car is warm the popping goes away. I'm still curious what's causing that condition.

The sound is like a misfire, could be the wastegates, or pre-det.

I don't know at this point... I'll see if I can get a video with the popping sound.
18 Volvo S90 Inscription - 2.0T Twin Charged - Polestar Tuned.
17 Lincoln MKZ 3.0T GTDI -To Tune, or Not To Tune -- THAT is the question.
15 Road Glide Special - CFR Exhaust, Powder Coated everything, DirtyAir Air ride
14 Taurus SHO (Sold)
LMS 93 V8 3Bar Tune, K&N Intake, LMS 160 t-stat, LMS pre-gapped plugs, Corsa Exhaust

14SHOCAR

#47
18 Volvo S90 Inscription - 2.0T Twin Charged - Polestar Tuned.
17 Lincoln MKZ 3.0T GTDI -To Tune, or Not To Tune -- THAT is the question.
15 Road Glide Special - CFR Exhaust, Powder Coated everything, DirtyAir Air ride
14 Taurus SHO (Sold)
LMS 93 V8 3Bar Tune, K&N Intake, LMS 160 t-stat, LMS pre-gapped plugs, Corsa Exhaust

AJP turbo

14shocar u might want to try to run the fuel that u are supposed to run...i know its a crazy concept but sometimes when the tune is set for pump gas the car will run properly when u run pump gas.

Sometimes the wild speculation on this forum is too much for me to take...u make mention that it could be wastegates opening or pre detonation...those 2 things are vastly different...if u suspect either of those then why not bad tie rods or a bad brake caliper gasket?

Isnt the whole idea of running the E mix to combat the terrible kr that alot of u think u have?...so then why would high E fuel becausing pre det?

U mention that u thought in time the car would learn and adaptives will take over...the tune is only capable of so much and most of the average 3 bar tunes are not touching the fuel scaling other than making sure the map sensor is scaled for the new sensor for normal gas .

More than likely u have random times with large fuel trims and if it cant trim enough quickly then it could be lean or rich temporarily and ur new exhaust doesnt suppress the previous sound spikes.

The slopes and intercepts in the speed density part of the tune are not optimized for higher E fuels...

U guys would be amazed at how simple the changes are in the tune to make a 3 bar tune..2 values thats all...that doesnt get boost up but u can put a 3 bar sensor in the manifold and change 2 values and the cars fueling is properly scaled but everything in the fuel portion is skewed when u run more e ....if u dont make the changes then u are more heavily relying on the primary 02 sensors to make the changes but u will have higher than recommended fuel trim and thats not the proper way to have a tune set up
SCT Dealer/Custom Calibrator                        
Specializing in 3.5 Ecoboost   
Remote/email custom tuning including E85 blends 
Authorized retailer for all SCT devices. 
 
Former:2014 PP SHO
3 bar 93 tune, Airaid, Stainless Works non catted DP's  
405whp/520tq
Dyno
     
Current:2016 F150 2.7 Ecoboost
Tuning in progress

14SHOCAR

LOL I just PM'd you (great timing on the response). I was experimenting with the fuel and going to dyno it to debunk the "extra horsepower" claims. This is the same symptom as I had after I put catless dps on the car (with the same tank of gas). There has to be something funky with the tune IMHO.
18 Volvo S90 Inscription - 2.0T Twin Charged - Polestar Tuned.
17 Lincoln MKZ 3.0T GTDI -To Tune, or Not To Tune -- THAT is the question.
15 Road Glide Special - CFR Exhaust, Powder Coated everything, DirtyAir Air ride
14 Taurus SHO (Sold)
LMS 93 V8 3Bar Tune, K&N Intake, LMS 160 t-stat, LMS pre-gapped plugs, Corsa Exhaust

AJP turbo

Well i learned that part of a perfect tune is u want stft to be less than 5% and preferably less than 3...and that doesnt change whether u are tuning a speed density(map) based or a mass airflow car(maf)...some cars have both....and the more e fuel u add u change the stoic point of the fuel and the required volume of delivered fuel will need to be adjusted in the tune to achieve the same commanded lambda....the o2's will adjust to a point but that not the preferred way...if fuel scaling is correct then even with a failing 02 sensor fueling will still be spot on because the fuel tuning is right.

Lower fuel trims will make for a smoother running car...adaptive fueling and fuel trim adjustment was meant to compensae for failing and or worn components...to take up the slop in a sense

Anything that changes ve or volumetric efficiency will require fuel tuning...down pipes have an effect ..even catted ones because they affect how the cylinders fill and evacuate gas which changes ve
SCT Dealer/Custom Calibrator                        
Specializing in 3.5 Ecoboost   
Remote/email custom tuning including E85 blends 
Authorized retailer for all SCT devices. 
 
Former:2014 PP SHO
3 bar 93 tune, Airaid, Stainless Works non catted DP's  
405whp/520tq
Dyno
     
Current:2016 F150 2.7 Ecoboost
Tuning in progress

SHOdded

I think I have posted this before, but here's a page that shows you how to calculate your fuel's stoich:
http://ethanolpro.tripod.com/id213.html

•Natural gas: 17.2
•Gasoline: 14.7
•Propane: 15.5 
•Ethanol: 9
•Methanol: 6.4
•Hydrogen: 34
•Diesel: 14.6
2007 Ford Edge SEL, Powerstop F/R Brake Kit, TXT LED 6000K Lo & Hi Beams, W16W LED Reverse Bulbs, 3BSpec 2.5w Map Lights, 5W Cree rear dome lights, 5W Cree cargo light, DTBL LED Taillights

If tuned:  Take note of the strategy code as you return to stock (including 3 bar MAP to 2 bar MAP) -> take car in & get it serviced -> check strategy code when you get car back -> have tuner update your tune if the strategy code has changed -> reload tune -> ENJOY!

ZSHO

#52
I certainly am no expert in this field,but think precautionary measures should be advised especially when uncertain on the exact mixture needed,dont think tuners encourage this concept,think its more of a play at your own risk conception which could have a different outcome at the end which can vary by user.  Z


2013 Performance Package SHO| Livernois Custom Methanol Tune|3-Bar Map|Reische-170-Stat|Full Race Tial-10psi BOV in Black|PPE-Gloss Black Hot Pipes|EPP Dual Intake in Gloss Black|PPE Catted DP|Corsa Sport Cat Back Exhaust|H&R Sport-Springs|CFM Performance Billet Valve Cover Breather In Gloss Black|Llumar 20%Ceramic window Tint|MSD Ignition Coils in Black|Extreme Roof Spoiler|Redline Fluids all around|Gearhead Intercooler|First-SHO With Direct Port Alky-VP-M1-100%-Methanol Injection|LMS-Custom-Dyno-Tuned @ 415whp-465wtq| Best Trap Speed of 115.54 mph|

AJP turbo

Even with all i just posted i seriously doubt ur hurting anything...ur getting the benefit of increased octane from the ethanol...but ur fueling will be less than perfect if that bugs u...if it doesnt and the popping doesnt then run it.

Ir ur ocd about the noise than im not sure why u are messing with adding various fuels and throwing off trims...

Thats whats nice about sct and the graphs and tools available with livelink...u are able to zoom in and isolate parts of ur log and really analyze what u have going on at certain times
SCT Dealer/Custom Calibrator                        
Specializing in 3.5 Ecoboost   
Remote/email custom tuning including E85 blends 
Authorized retailer for all SCT devices. 
 
Former:2014 PP SHO
3 bar 93 tune, Airaid, Stainless Works non catted DP's  
405whp/520tq
Dyno
     
Current:2016 F150 2.7 Ecoboost
Tuning in progress

FoMoCoSHO

Quote from: ajpturbo on October 06, 2015, 02:25:24 PM
14shocar u might want to try to run the fuel that u are supposed to run...i know its a crazy concept but sometimes when the tune is set for pump gas the car will run properly when u run pump gas.

Sometimes the wild speculation on this forum is too much for me to take...u make mention that it could be wastegates opening or pre detonation...those 2 things are vastly different...if u suspect either of those then why not bad tie rods or a bad brake caliper gasket?

Isnt the whole idea of running the E mix to combat the terrible kr that alot of u think u have?...so then why would high E fuel becausing pre det?

U mention that u thought in time the car would learn and adaptives will take over...the tune is only capable of so much and most of the average 3 bar tunes are not touching the fuel scaling other than making sure the map sensor is scaled for the new sensor for normal gas .

More than likely u have random times with large fuel trims and if it cant trim enough quickly then it could be lean or rich temporarily and ur new exhaust doesnt suppress the previous sound spikes.

The slopes and intercepts in the speed density part of the tune are not optimized for higher E fuels...

U guys would be amazed at how simple the changes are in the tune to make a 3 bar tune..2 values thats all...that doesnt get boost up but u can put a 3 bar sensor in the manifold and change 2 values and the cars fueling is properly scaled but everything in the fuel portion is skewed when u run more e ....if u dont make the changes then u are more heavily relying on the primary 02 sensors to make the changes but u will have higher than recommended fuel trim and thats not the proper way to have a tune set up
I get what you are saying but at these levels we are letting the car adapt exactly how its designed to react to different fuels. All of our cars are stoiched at E10 but many times that's not what we're getting. The 2013+are rated for E-15. There was no change in the programming to deal with this because the deductive fuel logic is already there and there was no need. Had there been a change, it would've been listed in the EPA certification. Driving through the US you will see blends ranging from E0-E15 and no tune change is required.  The ECM is using the exact same strategy it uses for E15 as it does for E20 and so on. As long as you don't exceed the LTFT and subsequent imposed time limits at those levels you won't see a cel or dtc.

As I've stated a few times there can be some throttle response laziness when changing blends but once the car is driven and has the time to adapt (trim), that disappears and stays gone if you continue at that blend level. Interestingly when going back to a blend I had previously ran, this was no longer an issue. 

I'm not sure high blends or straight E-85 are even necessary as the law of diminishing returns is at play here and there is more energy in straight gas. From what I've researched E20 seems to be the sweet spot as far as performance, driveability, and economy goes. 

Now as far as a dyno "debunking the myths"....That seems to be a tad dismissive as members including myself have posted up actual time slips documenting ET drop and higher traps doing nothing but adding some corn. Unless you are willing to test with a known fuel composition, drain the tank, add another known fuel composition, drive the car for a while so DFL can do it's job than retest you won't be debunking anything. Now throw in environmental differences (Like different air temps being crammed down the intake at 90MPH) that can't be duplicated on the dyno. The dyno is a tool, not the final say on what actually happens at the track. Another good example is your CAI findings on the controlled dyno vs other members time slips on the uncontrolled track with back to back intake changes/runs. Hell some days I've seen my best times after the 7th or 8th run with much higher IAT2 than when I started. Good luck figuring that out on the dyno.

And I want to clarify something...

E85 doesn't make any extra power!

What it does is create optimal in cylinder conditions through effective octane and cooling for the car to run max settings of whatever tune you happen to be running, whether it's stock or tuned. My 2013 wasn't magically faster with E-85, it just created the condition for the car to run at its max potential as it came from the factory and the straight 93 in my area could not.

The trick is finding the lowest amount of E that will create those conditions while keeping rail pressure high.




AJP turbo

Fomo is right and makes good points...the low E mixes that alot of u are using IS within the adaptive limits so its not a terrible idea IF u really understand what u are doing however i think most people dont.

And fomo understands ethano quite well i think...the ethanol will make power because the computer can take advantage of the fuel properties because of the spark logic through programming and sensor capability.

E20 maybe be optimum for us because of the tune but e85 would be even better if we had the fuel volume capacity...u could advance timing even further and see real power...people have been using it for year on boosted cars instead of race fuel

I can look and see where the tune caps the trims and i want to say the stft is in the 30% range without throwing a cel or dtc..so in theory u can run high blends of E and keep trims in the 20% range and car will compensate amd run fine...but is that good tune?..ask any tuner that has a good reputation and the answer will be a resounding no...read any tuning handbook and the target for stft will be less than 5%
SCT Dealer/Custom Calibrator                        
Specializing in 3.5 Ecoboost   
Remote/email custom tuning including E85 blends 
Authorized retailer for all SCT devices. 
 
Former:2014 PP SHO
3 bar 93 tune, Airaid, Stainless Works non catted DP's  
405whp/520tq
Dyno
     
Current:2016 F150 2.7 Ecoboost
Tuning in progress

FoMoCoSHO

You are comparing apples to oranges because those boosted race cars aren't using direct injection.

Directly injecting E-85 into the cylinder amplifies its characteristics greatly so it behaves like E85 on steroids....So we need much less to attain those conditions present in the non DI boosted straight E85 race cars.

This is actually good for us because straight gas will always outperform corn because it has more energy and as long as we keep fuel volume in check, we have the best of both worlds. I think what is missing here is someone that has plentiful E-85 and an AWD dyno with a good tuner available to figure out where the law of diminishing returns comes into play. My guess was the 40-50% range but your experiences with E10 with high boost and turbos outside their efficiency range coupled with no knock issues makes me think it could be far lower. The mazdaspeed guys are maxing out their timing at the 25% level so that is another clue.






AJP turbo

I could be making a poor comparison but i suspect that it would take e85 to approach mbt timing....i thought some of u out there are still getting some kr even with E mixes of 20% telling me more pre ignition resistance is required

There are mbt spark tables in the tune and we are nowhere near them...ill look tonight at what the values are.

Its well into the 20's and 30's for timing at loads over 1.7...and we wiuld typically be in the low teens....i have my doubts that an E mix of 20 would allow timing increases that high even being direct injected but i dont know...but that serious timing that would require high octane fuel
SCT Dealer/Custom Calibrator                        
Specializing in 3.5 Ecoboost   
Remote/email custom tuning including E85 blends 
Authorized retailer for all SCT devices. 
 
Former:2014 PP SHO
3 bar 93 tune, Airaid, Stainless Works non catted DP's  
405whp/520tq
Dyno
     
Current:2016 F150 2.7 Ecoboost
Tuning in progress

FoMoCoSHO

And you may be correct....The problem is we can't find out for sure since we don't have the volume to run an aggressive tune with higher levels.

And there's the part once again where the research done in a controlled lab environment at a controlled rpm and load doesn't correlate exactly to the real world when dealing with a multitude of changing conditions.

I'd love to see those tables btw...


AJP turbo

Quote from: FoMoCoSHO on October 06, 2015, 05:37:46 PM


I'd love to see those tables btw...

Ok ill look and post them up but i wont be home til after 2 am tonight. You could test it though and wouldnt really need much more if any fuel as long as load was the same...like you could see how high timing could be as say 15 psi with different fuel.

I still think im going to rent a dyno at the end of october and i plan on getting some vp street blaze or sunoco 260gt and seeing if i can add a few degress of timing but even if the knock sensors are ok im not gonna go crazy ...im only going to add a max of 5 degrees over stock amd that should yield pretty good gains but 5 over stock if i remember is nowhere near mbt....i think oem use race fuels and create spark curves to see what cylinder pressures make the most torque amd thats how mbt spark tables are created...im not really why they include that data in the tunes but they do.....on a normally aspirated car tou can get much closer to the mbt spark with pump gas than we do because of the boost obviously.

Sometimes on N/A cars with race gas you can exceed mbt spark because the fuel can take it but u loose power but that never happens with boost
SCT Dealer/Custom Calibrator                        
Specializing in 3.5 Ecoboost   
Remote/email custom tuning including E85 blends 
Authorized retailer for all SCT devices. 
 
Former:2014 PP SHO
3 bar 93 tune, Airaid, Stainless Works non catted DP's  
405whp/520tq
Dyno
     
Current:2016 F150 2.7 Ecoboost
Tuning in progress