Started by SHO-Time, July 16, 2015, 10:22:58 AM
Quote from: FoMoCoSHO on March 24, 2016, 02:03:47 PMMan, I love those rotofab intakes, I wish they'd give us some love.Engine covers look great as well.Who did your tuning?
Quote from: SHO-Time on March 24, 2016, 11:31:10 AMThanks 14 TUX BL!When originally posting my thread, it was never intended to start a "what car is better" or "AWD vs RWD" argument, but such is the internet. As everything in life, people will choose what ever product best suits their preferences, personality and/or overall tastes. I enjoyed my SHO very much, I simply decided to go in a different direction.
QuoteWith that said, I did get the SS tuned a couple of weeks ago...Basline with Rotofab Intake = 366 RWHP / 373 RWTQRotoFab CAI & Dyno-Tune = 390 RWHP / 388 RWTQ
Quote from: SHO-Time on March 24, 2016, 11:31:10 AMQuote from: 14 TUX BL on March 24, 2016, 12:13:50 AMI stopped reading posts because I don't want to get into needless arguments, just want to go down with this final thought if that's ok:SHO-Time originally posted on his SS, a car he was clearly proud of. I wish him the best!My response was/remains it's a great looking car with equally great performance. But for me, I needed a one-solution AWD performance sedan, and the SHO fit the bill (plus, I'm a Ford guy to a fault).I wish our SHO's pulled 13.0's stock (C&D says the auto SS is even a tenth faster at 12.9) but I'll have to be content with my 13.79 non-PP bone stock ET, which doesn't carry a $1300 Gas Guzzler Tax equipped with an automatic.Bottom line is the SS is a commendable car that has earned respect in the performance sedan market, as well it should.PEACEThanks 14 TUX BL!When originally posting my thread, it was never intended to start a "what car is better" or "AWD vs RWD" argument, but such is the internet. As everything in life, people will choose what ever product best suits their preferences, personality and/or overall tastes. I enjoyed my SHO very much, I simply decided to go in a different direction. With that said, I did get the SS tuned a couple of weeks ago...Basline with Rotofab Intake = 366 RWHP / 373 RWTQRotoFab CAI & Dyno-Tune = 390 RWHP / 388 RWTQAnd I had these custom painted engine covers made
Quote from: 14 TUX BL on March 24, 2016, 12:13:50 AMI stopped reading posts because I don't want to get into needless arguments, just want to go down with this final thought if that's ok:SHO-Time originally posted on his SS, a car he was clearly proud of. I wish him the best!My response was/remains it's a great looking car with equally great performance. But for me, I needed a one-solution AWD performance sedan, and the SHO fit the bill (plus, I'm a Ford guy to a fault).I wish our SHO's pulled 13.0's stock (C&D says the auto SS is even a tenth faster at 12.9) but I'll have to be content with my 13.79 non-PP bone stock ET, which doesn't carry a $1300 Gas Guzzler Tax equipped with an automatic.Bottom line is the SS is a commendable car that has earned respect in the performance sedan market, as well it should.PEACE