• Welcome to Ecoboost Performance Forum. Please log in or sign up.
collapse

Torque Knock PID: signed(A)/2 or signed(A)/2+(B/512)

Started by Gray Brick, December 01, 2014, 05:10:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Gray Brick

I have been using signed(A)/2 on my 2013 Ecoboost Flex

What is the difference between these two equations? Is one more accurate?

PID 2203ec
signed(A)/2
or
signed(A)/2+(B/512)

2013 Ecoboost Ford Flex
AJP Tune (ATP+2) in progress , Livernois HPFP, 3 Bar MAP, UPR Catch Can, 100% Methanol w/ braided steel lines, 3" Downpipes -->2.5" X-pipe --> 2.5" Magnaflow exhaust, 2.5" air inlets to each turbo with cone filter, Custom water to air intercooler with chiller
275/40-20 Front 315/35-20 Rear Tires
---12.419ET/112.43MPH @ 5150 lbs in the 1/4---

SHOnUup

If I'm remembering the difference right. The latter one breaks it down into tenths vs. 1/2 degree.

Rich

2011 Sterling Gray Metallic SHO non PP,
12.4211 @ 110.28 Livernois 3bar tune & CAI,
Added since...PPE catless Dpipes, Megan coilovers, Powergrid adjustable end links, and EBC slotted rotors and red stuff pads.
Tommy Designs grille with carbon fiber hydrographics, fender badges and fog bezels hydrodipped also, tinted windows, head & taillights, debadged trunk with all chrome plasti-dipped, black calipers, obdlink mx scantool running torque pro on 7" tablet.

ecoboostsho

That is correct. Just finer resolution. You'll still get close but could be off by a degree. In other words a 2.9 would only look like a 2 since it truncates the decimal...I recommend you use the second formula.

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

2013 White SHO w/PP, Gearhead Tuned, 3 Bar, 160T, Plugs...Mess with the Bull and you'll get the Horn. :)
Previous 2011 Tuxedo Black SHO w/PP - 12.89 1/4 Mile