• Welcome to Ecoboost Performance Forum. Please log in or sign up.
collapse

1/8 Mile report, 10/10/13, LMS SCT stage 4 vs LMS Mycal 4+

Started by SoCalSHO, October 12, 2013, 07:13:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

SoCalSHO

So, I was at the track on Thursday night, TNT. Racing started at 5:00PM. D/A ranged from a high of 1029 at 4:47PM to 670 at 7:47PM. First 2 runs were with the LMS, stage 4 tune from the SCT, the rest were LMS stage 4+ using a mycal tune. When I complained before that my tunes seemed to be the same, meaning, no advantage with the 4+/Mycal, the complaint was dismissed, because the runs were not on the same day, although the D/A's were virtually identical.

LMS, Stage 4, SCT tune

4:56PM   #1
R/T    .389
60'     1.924
1/8    8.472
MPH   82.39

~5;10PM    #2
R/T     .165
60'     1.905
1/8    8.451
MPH    82.53

From here, i switched to the LMS Stage 4+ Mycal tune

5:39PM  #3
R/T   .485
60'    1.924
1/8    8.469
MPH   82.81

5:43PM   #4
R/T    .334
60'     1.909
1/8    8.440
MPH   83.07

Then I jump to race #8, with the best times
7:08PM
R/T   .525
60'    1.891
1/8   8.444
MPH  82.88


So, those were out of 9 runs. You can see run #1 was virtually identical to run #3. Run #3 should have had better times, since the D/A was probably lower (D/A @ 4:47 was 1029, and at 5:47 was @ 984). Run #2, which was closer in time to #3, was still better @ 60' and 1/8 mile, but not MPH.

So, you that are more experienced, it looks as though the stage 4+ is only going to get me a slightly higher MPH, but other than that, Nada. What do you think?

Although, I did beat a new Camaro SS and a CTS-V.
Robert
2010 Met White
GH tuned, 3 Bar, upgraded turbos, 91 Oct
K&N drop-in or airaid, Corsa Cat-back
1/8 Mile 8.380@83.42MPH

mjhpadi

Those numbers are very interesting but before drawing any conclusions, I would think you should repeat this on a 1/4 mile track, I think you may see more of a difference in the 1/4 then in the 1/8.  I don't have anything to base this on, just a hunch, that you may see a difference.  I would at least try it, before making any conclusions.
2010 Candy Red SHO, Livernois Stage 4 Tune, Airaid CAI, Tinted Headlamps & Tails, LED Interior Lighting, LED Running Lights, LED Puddle and License Plate Lamps, LED DRL's, Window Tint, Rear Window Spoiler, V3 Triton Switchback Running Lights, Colgan Bra, Ford Racing Gauges (oil pressure, oil temperature, boost/vacuum)
Replaced by 2020 Hertiage Edition GT-350

SoCalSHO

You know, if I had a track that was in 3 hours drive, I would. You would think, where drag racing started, we would have a track. This is what I have available. I thought the same thing though.
Robert
2010 Met White
GH tuned, 3 Bar, upgraded turbos, 91 Oct
K&N drop-in or airaid, Corsa Cat-back
1/8 Mile 8.380@83.42MPH

SoCalSHO

Oh, this was also 3 gallons a gas, all crap out of the car (No spare or rear headrests), 2200RPM launch, front tires aired down to 30.
Robert
2010 Met White
GH tuned, 3 Bar, upgraded turbos, 91 Oct
K&N drop-in or airaid, Corsa Cat-back
1/8 Mile 8.380@83.42MPH

DJE624

Quote from: SoCalSHO on October 12, 2013, 07:25:11 PM
You know, if I had a track that was in 3 hours drive, I would. You would think, where drag racing started, we would have a track. This is what I have available. I thought the same thing though.
I was kinda thinkin' the same thing.  Another gear or two to ride out with the sustained boost.  Your 1/8s are pretty close to mine and I'm on 93 Octane.  I think with better DA's we will hit the 12s.  My dyno showed a real difference.  Not so much more at peak torque, but a big difference in sustaining it along the curve. 

BlueSHO

Interesting... I wonder how my 93 performance high boost thermostat tune would compare tune wise. The XSports tunes are not called by stages..

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 4

2016 SHO Blue Jeans
2001 Lightning
1996 Mystic Cobra

SoCalSHO

I am sure it would do better.
Robert
2010 Met White
GH tuned, 3 Bar, upgraded turbos, 91 Oct
K&N drop-in or airaid, Corsa Cat-back
1/8 Mile 8.380@83.42MPH