Quote from: Dxlnt1 on August 18, 2015, 11:50:11 PM
Has anyone been able speak with LMS, L.E.T. and/or Unleashed and get their input? Would be awesome for if THE ecoboost tuners had something to say on this topic as well.
Since fuel delivery one of the biggest hinderances with these engine platform, a better fuel with more timing has to mean more power right? And IF that holds true, some of our cravings for more power can be addressed seemingly. If all of our tunes can be made to say run on an equivalent 96 octane fuel, that would seemingly add 10-25 hp? Im guessing but my 91 octane tune vs some you guys 93 octane fuel is yielding almost half second better track times and higher trap speeds.
I think the best case scenario, after reading 6 pages (and truly understanding a smaller portion of the big picture BND is very carefully laying out) is that this could take the place of meth. Therefore, I doubt the tunes will be improved using any of the boosters (BND, is 'booster' the correct term since you explicitly stated ACES IV is not considered an additive). Let me be clear- my opinion at this point is that the best we are looking at is a choice between installing a meth kit, or using ACES IV booster. As far as tunes go, I would assume they would be the same as a typical meth setup.
If this is the case, I think this is a pretty fantastic scenario. The difference (I think) would be that you must use the booster at every fillup, where meth usage could be controlled.
BND- Thank you for joining the site. This product went from snakeoil that I disregarded when the post was originally made, to a set of products I am keeping on my radar. You have piece-mailed throughout your posts what you would recommend for our cars, which is great info. Could you flat out spell it out in one post that we can reference to better make a decision?