Print Page - 2.25 vs 2.5 exhaust piping

Title: 2.25 vs 2.5 exhaust piping
Post by: Medinafx on July 22, 2017, 03:02:44 PM

I can't decide between 2.25 exhaust pipe and 2.5.
Which one is better? Does paying over 1200 for a 2.5 exhaust system pay off in performance or just build your own in 2.25 piping such as stock?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2.25 vs 2.5 exhaust piping
Post by: ZSHO on July 22, 2017, 03:09:58 PM

Welcome aboard Medinafx! What type of vehicle do you have?
I would say minimal gains can be had with any type of aftermarket exhaust so essentially the true bottle neck are the DP.
Due setup an intro at your earliest convenience, thanks. Z

http://www.ecoboostperformanceforum.com/index.php/board,14.0.html (http://www.ecoboostperformanceforum.com/index.php/board,14.0.html)

Title: Re: 2.25 vs 2.5 exhaust piping
Post by: Heelfan1 on July 22, 2017, 05:32:23 PM

I totally agree about the bottle next being the biggest issue on this platform but I found this one day just wasting time. I was surprised at the difference but again this is a totally different application.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_PVXvHkr-Vs

Title: Re: 2.25 vs 2.5 exhaust piping
Post by: Medinafx on July 22, 2017, 06:15:30 PM

I'm going to buy catless downpipes in the future. I think I'm going to go with dynomax axle back exhaust and xpipe in place of the third cat & resonator. I heard a few YouTube clips and it sounds good

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2.25 vs 2.5 exhaust piping
Post by: Medinafx on July 24, 2017, 01:09:53 PM

Sound wise which one would you guys pick dynomax or borla s type.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ecoboost Performance Forum

Ecoboost Performance => Performance => Topic started by: Medinafx on July 22, 2017, 03:02:44 PM