Ecoboost Performance Forum

Ecoboost Performance => Ecoboost Tuning! => Datalogging and Gauges => Topic started by: GT500R on December 12, 2015, 12:13:46 AM

Title: VBOX TESTED: 93 LMS TUNE W/K&N FILTER
Post by: GT500R on December 12, 2015, 12:13:46 AM
Previous Tests:
http://www.fordedgeforum.com/topic/19286-vbox-tested-0-60-w-93-perf-tune-vs-rpm/ (http://www.fordedgeforum.com/topic/19286-vbox-tested-0-60-w-93-perf-tune-vs-rpm/)
http://www.fordedgeforum.com/topic/19015-vbox-tested-0-60-vs-rpm-launch/ (http://www.fordedgeforum.com/topic/19015-vbox-tested-0-60-vs-rpm-launch/)
http://www.fordedgeforum.com/topic/18909-vbox-tested-drive-vs-sport-0-60/ (http://www.fordedgeforum.com/topic/18909-vbox-tested-drive-vs-sport-0-60/)
 
So after dave80 told me K&N Filters for the car are on sale during Black Friday ($37 plus $10 rebate), I decided to get one and see if there is any difference in performance.
 
Testing was done from 30-60 and 40-80 very most consistent results since I most likely couldn't do the same exact launch every single time for 0-60. (Plus there was a small amount of moisture on the road)
 
Le Filter ->(http://i.imgur.com/V9r3xPX.jpg?)
 
 
Le Testing results -> (http://i.imgur.com/98dCqXi.png)
 
 
Test Notes:
 - Can't really feel any difference by the seat of my pants (didn't expect to)
 - MPG seem to be up slightly (yay)
 - Seems that it does make the car slightly quicker
 - Based on testing, the filter is good for a tenth or so in the 1/4 mile or longer roll runs.
 - Based on 40-80, it seems that the K&N car is 10 feet in front at 80 mph which is roughly 1/2 car, not bad.
 
Will most likely retest a 0-60 to see if there is any difference when it dries up a bit.
 
Thanks guys.
Title: Re: VBOX TESTED: 93 LMS TUNE W/K&N FILTER
Post by: SHOdded on December 12, 2015, 06:40:58 AM
That would be consistent with the experiences we have seen so far.  The filter, rather than the intake kit, performs better.  Waiting to see results from the "dry" runs :)
Title: Re: VBOX TESTED: 93 LMS TUNE W/K&N FILTER
Post by: GT500R on December 12, 2015, 10:54:03 AM
Quote from: SHOdded on December 12, 2015, 06:40:58 AM
That would be consistent with the experiences we have seen so far.  The filter, rather than the intake kit, performs better.  Waiting to see results from the "dry" runs :)

Bingo, that is why I didn't pony up the extra money for a full intake or anything other then a filter, the gains really aren't there for the $$$$.
Title: Re: VBOX TESTED: 93 LMS TUNE W/K&N FILTER
Post by: Scott4957 on December 12, 2015, 10:58:30 AM
Has anyone done this with a dry flow filter rather than an oiled filter like the K&N? I assume the results would be very similar.
Title: Re: VBOX TESTED: 93 LMS TUNE W/K&N FILTER
Post by: SHOdded on December 12, 2015, 11:28:46 AM
I can def say there are "sound" gains from the DryFlow, not sure about performance gains, though another Edge owner (11+) has seen some mpg improvements.
Title: Re: VBOX TESTED: 93 LMS TUNE W/K&N FILTER
Post by: Vortech347 on December 12, 2015, 05:11:45 PM
Nice to see some hard numbers.  Looks like this maybe something I pick up.
EhPortal 1.39.5 © 2024, WebDev