Here's a pretty good, realistic review of the new FuSpo. There are no hard #s yet, unfortunately, but this review seems to fit my opinion nicely.
http://www.autoblog.com/2016/09/08/2017-ford-fusion-sport-first-drive-review/ (http://www.autoblog.com/2016/09/08/2017-ford-fusion-sport-first-drive-review/)
This article kiinda takes a jab at the SHO, which everybody makes out to be some big wallowing pig. I know it's a bit bigger than the Fusion, but it can't be THAT bad, can it?
Well, maybe not so challenging ...
! No longer available (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGEAiozyh6U#)
Quote from: BOT_ROCKET on September 13, 2016, 01:31:14 AM
Here's a pretty good, realistic review of the new FuSpo. There are no hard #s yet, unfortunately, but this review seems to fit my opinion nicely.
http://www.autoblog.com/2016/09/08/2017-ford-fusion-sport-first-drive-review/ (http://www.autoblog.com/2016/09/08/2017-ford-fusion-sport-first-drive-review/)
This article kiinda takes a jab at the SHO, which everybody makes out to be some big wallowing pig. I know it's a bit bigger than the Fusion, but it can't be THAT bad, can it?
Nothing bad about it...
Its all BS, these big girls can dance.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/tested-2017-ford-fusion-sport-review (http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/tested-2017-ford-fusion-sport-review)
A different result.....
Oops, I posted a new thread about the C&D article...mods can delete it.
Similar times to C&D's test of the 2013 SHO. Compare both test sheets, they're both close.
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/tested-2017-ford-fusion-sport-review-car-and-driverfordfusionsportecoboostawd2017.pdf (http://media.caranddriver.com/files/tested-2017-ford-fusion-sport-review-car-and-driverfordfusionsportecoboostawd2017.pdf)
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/2013-ford-taurus-sho-instrumented-test-review-car-and-driver2013-ford-taurus-sho-test-sheet.pdf (http://media.caranddriver.com/files/2013-ford-taurus-sho-instrumented-test-review-car-and-driver2013-ford-taurus-sho-test-sheet.pdf)
Sorry...I didn't see the new thread.... Mods can delete my post if you prefer.
Done. Z :)
These are good numbers. Look at that curb weight! These acceleration numbers are quite a bit stronger than I have seen elsewhere. Makes me a little bit skeptical but they really are in line with what you would expect with 380 ft/lbs of torque.
C/D TEST RESULTS:
Curb weight: 4128 lb
Zero to 60 mph: 5.1 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 13.3 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 24.7 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 5.8 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.9 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 3.5 sec
Standing ΒΌ-mile: 13.7 sec @ 101 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 131 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 178 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad*: 0.84 g
Really interested to see times with a tune.
Makes me want to see times for an MKZ or Continental with the 3.0.