Quote from: Jordan on October 07, 2018, 08:57:16 PM
I really think the big difference was in the sixty foot. Other then that with the lower da what not they seem to kind of even out. I feel like more passes between the two tunes would make for a better average. I know gh does good work and livernois is pretty conservative so to me I feel like there is more on the table for gh to grab but I'm also not a tuner
I tend to agree. Matt said he won't turn it up because of heat issues running the turbos past efficiency, so it's pretty maxed out until the IC comes out.
LMS does tend to leave some on the table, in my last datalog of their E30 tune I easily maxed out the spark available.
LMS runs the turbos on this tune right at the edge of efficiency, Matt's does a bit over, both run similar spark but Matt allows the knock sensors to add 1.5 degrees more on the top end..
I think both tunes are well done, Matt takes full advantage of the pump but due to heat issues can't push the boost to take advantage of the extra psi he can get out of the pump....
If I can get to the track on a day where I can get 3-4 runs in... I think it would be an interesting heads up race between the two tunes...
Just wish I could swap from LMS to GH easily.. it requires a phone call to LMS to swap back to my original strategy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk