• Welcome to Ecoboost Performance Forum. Please log in or sign up.
collapse

K&N vs OEM air filter testing

Started by FoMoCoSHO, August 29, 2016, 01:03:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

metroplex

How did it fit in your box? I bought 2 recently and none fit properly. They were a tad small.
Previously: 2014 SHO
12.4 @ 110.9 mph

Current: 2017 Fusion Sport

paokara777

I'll take a photo of it tonight when i get home and post here
Daily Drive:
2010 Ford Taurus SHO, AJP 3BAR 93, K&N drop in
Weekend Cruiser:
1968 Ford Mustang Coupe 289 C Code
4Bl Carb, HiPo Cam, Headers and Exhaust

metroplex

#32
I'm not sure photos would help. I actually measured the airbox, stock paper filter, and the K&N filters. The K&N filters were slightly smaller and I could feel the difference once they were in the airbox as well. That said, it should be *fine* to use but I was not satisfied with the fit or quality. If you want to see a well made filter, look at the AEM or AFE panel filters. The AFE is a bit longer for some reason. I saw one test where the AEM barely flowed better than paper, probably because of its filtration.

If you want to see a filter that is worse than K&N, check out Green Filter. It's like the machine was completely drunk when it rolled the pleats, and the filtration media is worthless on the Green hence why it outflows everything else.
Previously: 2014 SHO
12.4 @ 110.9 mph

Current: 2017 Fusion Sport

paokara777

LOL I'm glad I didn't go the Green Filter then, I was tossing up between the two before I finally just got the K&N

The K&N filter as far as I recall, fit snug.

However, My SHO is a 2010 - maybe the air boxes changed a bit in the GEN2 SHOs
Daily Drive:
2010 Ford Taurus SHO, AJP 3BAR 93, K&N drop in
Weekend Cruiser:
1968 Ford Mustang Coupe 289 C Code
4Bl Carb, HiPo Cam, Headers and Exhaust