Quote from: kbeck59 on January 11, 2014, 10:58:57 PM
Quote from: 4DRHTRD on January 11, 2014, 10:49:41 PM
The solution for fuel that I have tested at E48 (50% E85/50% E10 91 octane) is the dual in tank fuel pump solution I have available with a fuel pressure regulator feeding the stock DI pump and injectors. The car worked great with this solution.
I can source all of the parts for you guys if you wish, right now you'll have to tap into the factory harness to feed the relays and use the factory fuel line as a return line.
I'm waiting for a returnless solution that would bolt in place easily, just waiting for Squash to finish their Uber Fueler.
That's 575 on pump gas for you guys doing the math, easy, peasy.
Solution under $1000 and will easily provide enough fuel to do what you want without meth.
So kudos to LMS but I have a solution already that has been tested in depth on my vehicle with big turbos.
You have a 2013 so FRP doesn't seem to be as big of an issue, at least that has been my experience.
I have been running E20-25 for a while with no side effects except Torque says the car makes more power.
My FRP at WOT is 2500-2700PSI.
I'm not sure I'm going to go any higher...I'm not sure there will be any benefit and I suspect that if my LTFT #'s go any higher I might throw a CEL. I've seen them as high as 19+. STFT is fine.
We have a different LPFP than the 2010-12's, 10 PSI more flow and it's variable.
When I get a tune, I'm hoping I can get a 93 tune plus an E-20 datalog tune to see if there's power to be had by my octane being 96. Also having tuner support, I may start to test the 2013's fuel system further.